Literature DB >> 9389230

Validation of the paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol in British practice.

U Werneke1, H Smith, I J Smith, J Taylor, R MacFaul.   

Abstract

The reliability and validity of the North American paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol (PAEP) for use in paediatric practice in Britain was tested. The protocol was applied to 418 case records of consecutive emergency admissions to three Yorkshire district general hospitals. The PAEP ratings were then compared with a clinical consensus opinion obtained from two expert panels. Altogether 32% of the admissions were rated inappropriate by the PAEP and 36% by the panels. Validity of the PAEP, as measured by agreement beyond chance with the expert panel rating, was only moderate with a kappa of 0.29 (95% confidence interval 0.11 to 0.47). The PAEP has limited validity for evaluating British paediatric practice. Utilisation review instruments developed in differing clinical cultures should be used with caution until shown to be valid for the practice setting under review.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9389230      PMCID: PMC1717328          DOI: 10.1136/adc.77.4.294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  12 in total

Review 1.  Appropriateness of cholecystectomy in the United Kingdom--a consensus panel approach.

Authors:  E A Scott; N Black
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Reliability and validity of utilization review criteria. Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol, Standardized Medreview Instrument, and Intensity-Severity-Discharge criteria.

Authors:  I Strumwasser; N V Paranjpe; D L Ronis; D Share; L J Sell
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Impact of varying panel membership on ratings of appropriateness in consensus panels: a comparison of a multi- and single disciplinary panel.

Authors:  I Coulter; A Adams; P Shekelle
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient.

Authors:  W D Thompson; S D Walter
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  The reliability and validity of the pediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol.

Authors:  K J Kemper; H D Fink; P L McCarthy
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1989-03

6.  Appropriateness of hospital utilization. The validity and reliability of the Intensity-Severity-Discharge Review System in a United Kingdom acute hospital setting.

Authors:  A L Inglis; J Coast; S F Gray; T J Peters; S J Frankel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Evaluation of appropriateness of paediatric admission.

Authors:  U Werneke; R MacFaul
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Medically inappropriate hospital use in a pediatric population.

Authors:  K J Kemper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-04-21       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Assessing the utilization of in-patient facilities in a Canadian pediatric hospital.

Authors:  H E Smith; S Sheps; D S Matheson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Assessing the need to hospitalize children: pediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol.

Authors:  B E Kreger; J D Restuccia
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 7.124

View more
  7 in total

1.  Taking a population perspective on child health.

Authors:  M Blair
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Unscheduled return visits within 72 hours to an assessment unit.

Authors:  M K Lal; M S Kibirige
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Parental and professional perception of need for emergency admission to hospital: prospective questionnaire based study.

Authors:  R MacFaul; M Stewart; U Werneke; J Taylor-Meek; H E Smith; I J Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 4.  Hospital based alternatives to acute paediatric admission: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Ogilvie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.791

5.  A pediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol for iran children hospitals.

Authors:  Anvar Esmaili; Hesam Seyedin; Obeidollah Faraji; Jalal Arabloo; Yaghoub Qahraman Bamdady; Shahin Shojaee; Saadat Hesam
Journal:  Iran Red Crescent Med J       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 0.611

6.  Bed Utilisation in an Irish Regional Paediatric Unit - A Cross-Sectional Study Using the Paediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (PAEP).

Authors:  Coilín ÓhAiseadha; Mai Mannix; Jean Saunders; Roy K Philip
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-11-01

7.  Prevalence and associated factors of inappropriate hospital admissions and days of children in a secondary hospital in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Wenwei Liu; Huimin Zhang; Haichen Zhang; Tongzhou Lyu; Suwei Yuan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.