Literature DB >> 3352697

Medically inappropriate hospital use in a pediatric population.

K J Kemper1.   

Abstract

To assess the extent of inappropriate hospital use in pediatric inpatients, I modified the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEP)--developed to assess inappropriate hospital use in adults--to apply to children and used it to evaluate pediatric inpatients retrospectively for every 10th day, from July 1982 to July 1983, at the University of Wisconsin Hospital. Of 1098 patient-days evaluated, 21.4 percent were judged to represent inappropriate hospital use on the basis of the protocol's criteria. The rate of inappropriate use varied according to admitting specialty, ranging from 7 of 70 days (10 percent) for pulmonary medicine to 43 of 61 days (70 percent) for neurology (P less than 0.005). There was a tendency toward lower rates of inappropriate use in uninsured patients (6 of 44 days [14 percent] vs. 226 of 1038 days [22 percent] in patients with Medicaid or private insurance, P = 0.13), and rates were lower in younger children (74 of 432 days [17 percent] in children less than or equal to 5 years of age vs. 162 of 656 days [25 percent] in children greater than 5 years of age, P less than 0.005). There was no variation according to sex, day of the week, or month. Contrary to expectations, inappropriate use decreased with increased lengths of stay (for stays of 1 day, 8 of 13 days were inappropriate [61 percent]; for stays of 2 to 6 days, 118 of 410 days were inappropriate [29 percent]; for 7 to 13 days, 58 of 291 [20 percent]; and for greater than or equal to 14 days, 51 of 362 [14 percent], P less than 0.001). I conclude that there is a substantial rate of inappropriate hospital use in pediatrics and that such use is more likely during short admissions than during long ones. Cost-containment efforts directed at limiting the length of hospitalization may therefore not reduce inappropriate hospital use in this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3352697     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198804213181605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  27 in total

1.  A regional evaluation of variation in low-severity hospital admissions.

Authors:  G E Rosenthal; D L Harper; A Shah; K E Covinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The impact of utilization management on readmissions among patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  D S Lessler; T M Wickizer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Medically inappropriate inpatient care in West Germany.

Authors:  R Klar; U Müller; J S Mönting
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1990

4.  A study of admissions to paediatric beds.

Authors:  G Rajaratnam
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  The effects of utilization review on hospital use and expenditures: a covariance analysis.

Authors:  T M Wickizer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Validation of the paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol in British practice.

Authors:  U Werneke; H Smith; I J Smith; J Taylor; R MacFaul
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Inappropriate Use of Hospital Beds in a Tertiary Care Service Hospital.

Authors:  Abhijit Chakravarty; N K Parmar; R Bhalwar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

8.  Are publicly insured children less likely to be admitted to hospital than the privately insured (and does it matter)?

Authors:  Diane Alexander; Janet Currie
Journal:  Econ Hum Biol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.184

9.  Trends in paediatric medical admissions.

Authors:  A M Hill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-06-03

10.  An example of hospital utilization review.

Authors:  L D Wilson
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1989-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.