Literature DB >> 7666708

Appropriateness of hospital utilization. The validity and reliability of the Intensity-Severity-Discharge Review System in a United Kingdom acute hospital setting.

A L Inglis1, J Coast, S F Gray, T J Peters, S J Frankel.   

Abstract

Assessing the appropriateness of hospital utilization in the United Kingdom may yield practical solutions to problems faced by both purchasers and providers of health care in the National Health Service. It is, however, essential that such assessment is based on a method that is both valid and reliable--in particular, valid in the context in which it is applied. Whereas American methods for the assessment of appropriateness have been shown to be valid in the United States, it is pertinent to question whether the application of such methods to the National Health Service also is valid given the different circumstances, both cultural and financial, under which health care is provided. A study of the appropriateness of admission and hospital stay for a sample of admissions to a large acute hospital in the United Kingdom was carried out, and the assessment of appropriateness was made using the Intensity-Severity-Discharge Review System with Adult criteria (ISD-A). The validity and reliability of using the ISD-A for assessing hospital utilization in the United Kingdom was evaluated. The ISD-A was found to have high reliability and to be valid for assessing appropriateness in the United Kingdom when a full range of alternative forms of care are presumed to be available. It was not found to be valid currently, therefore, for routine assessment of hospital utilization within the National Health Service, when alternatives often are not available.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7666708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  8 in total

1.  Validity of utilization review tools.

Authors:  P Dodek; B Trerise; C B Warriner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-11-14       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  How valid are utilization review tools in assessing appropriate use of acute care beds?

Authors:  N Kalant; M Berlinguet; J G Diodati; L Dragatakis; F Marcotte
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-27       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  A regional evaluation of variation in low-severity hospital admissions.

Authors:  G E Rosenthal; D L Harper; A Shah; K E Covinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Inappropriate hospital use by patients receiving care for medical conditions: targeting utilization review.

Authors:  C DeCoster; N P Roos; K C Carrière; S Peterson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Validation of the paediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol in British practice.

Authors:  U Werneke; H Smith; I J Smith; J Taylor; R MacFaul
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  Effectiveness of a physician-oriented feedback intervention on inappropriate hospital stays.

Authors:  Pedro Antón; Salvador Peiró; Jesús M Aranaz; Rafael Calpena; Antonio Compañ; Edith Leutscher; Vicenta Ruíz
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Alternatives to hospital care: what are they and who should decide?

Authors:  J Coast; A Inglis; S Frankel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-01-20

8.  Determining appropriateness for rehabilitation or other subacute care: is there a role for utilisation review?

Authors:  Christopher J Poulos; Kathy Eagar
Journal:  Aust New Zealand Health Policy       Date:  2007-03-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.