Literature DB >> 9388790

Enhancing mammography referral in primary care.

K E Grady1, J P Lemkau, N R Lee, C Caddell.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This 1-year randomized trial tested the efficacy of behavioral techniques for increasing mammography referrals by primary care physicians in small, community practices.
METHODS: Sixty-one practices were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (1) education-only control, (2) education plus cue enhancement using mammography chart stickers, and (3) education plus cue enhancement plus feedback and token rewards. Quarterly chart audits of a defined sample (N = 11,716) of women patients 50 years of age or older were conducted to document mammography referrals, completions, and compliance.
RESULTS: Referral and completion rates increased from baseline to first quarter and gradually declined thereafter. Overall, these rates were higher in the cuing conditions than in the control condition. In contrast, compliance rates in both experimental conditions increased over the year while remaining static in the control condition, demonstrating a strong and continuing effect for cue enhancement. Compliance increases were greatest for physicians who were older, nonwhite, with a second speciality, in solo practice, not members of the AMA, not residency trained, and not board certified.
CONCLUSIONS: Chart stickers can significantly increase mammography utilization in small, community practices. These practices are an efficient route to reaching large numbers of older women in need of mammography screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9388790     DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1997.0219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  20 in total

1.  The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening?

Authors:  M S O'Malley; J A Earp; S T Hawley; M J Schell; H F Mathews; J Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Changing clinical behaviour by making guidelines specific.

Authors:  Susan Michie; Marie Johnston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-07

Review 3.  A pediatric-focused review of the performance incentive literature.

Authors:  Alyna T Chien; Rena M Conti; Harold A Pollack
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.856

Review 4.  An overview of reviews evaluating the effectiveness of financial incentives in changing healthcare professional behaviours and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Martin P Eccles; Sasha Shepperd; Anthony Scott; Elena Parmelli; Fiona R Beyer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-07-06

Review 5.  Organizational factors and the cancer screening process.

Authors:  Rebecca Anhang Price; Jane Zapka; Heather Edwards; Stephen H Taplin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

6.  Strategies for improving pneumococcal vaccination in eligible patients.

Authors:  James M Smith; Thomas J Craig
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Impact assessment of a pay-for-performance program on breast cancer screening in France using micro data.

Authors:  Jonathan Sicsic; Carine Franc
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-06-21

8.  The role of physician involvement in Latinas' mammography screening adherence.

Authors:  Patricia González; Evelinn A Borrayo
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2011-01-13

9.  A systematic review of the use of theory in the design of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies and interpretation of the results of rigorous evaluations.

Authors:  Philippa Davies; Anne E Walker; Jeremy M Grimshaw
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care.

Authors:  Pieter Van Herck; Delphine De Smedt; Lieven Annemans; Roy Remmen; Meredith B Rosenthal; Walter Sermeus
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-23       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.