Literature DB >> 27329654

Impact assessment of a pay-for-performance program on breast cancer screening in France using micro data.

Jonathan Sicsic1, Carine Franc2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A voluntary-based pay-for-performance (P4P) program (the CAPI) aimed at general practitioners (GPs) was implemented in France in 2009. The program targeted prevention practices, including breast cancer screening, by offering a maximal amount of €245 for achieving a target screening rate among eligible women enrolled with the GP.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate the impact of the French P4P program (CAPI) on the early detection of breast cancer among women between 50 and 74 years old.
METHODS: Based on an administrative database of 50,752 women aged 50-74 years followed between 2007 and 2011, we estimated a difference-in-difference model of breast cancer screening uptake as a function of visit to a CAPI signatory referral GP, while controlling for both supply-side and demand-side determinants (e.g., sociodemographics, health and healthcare use).
RESULTS: Breast cancer screening rates have not changed significantly since the P4P program implementation. Overall, visiting a CAPI signatory referral GP at least once in the pre-CAPI period increased the probability of undergoing breast cancer screening by 1.38 % [95 % CI (0.41-2.35 %)], but the effect was not significantly different following the implementation of the contract.
CONCLUSION: The French P4P program had a nonsignificant impact on breast cancer screening uptake. This result may reflect the fact that the low-powered incentives implemented in France through the CAPI might not provide sufficient leverage to generate better practices, thus inviting regulators to seek additional tools beyond P4P in the field of prevention and screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer screening; Difference-in-difference; Incentives; Pay for performance; Primary care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27329654     DOI: 10.1007/s10198-016-0813-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Health Econ        ISSN: 1618-7598


  31 in total

Review 1.  Pay for performance in health care: an international overview of initiatives.

Authors:  Frank Eijkenaar
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2012-02-06       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 2.  Economic incentives and physicians' delivery of preventive care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robert Town; Robert Kane; Paul Johnson; Mary Butler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Physician response to pay-for-performance: evidence from a natural experiment.

Authors:  Jinhu Li; Jeremiah Hurley; Philip DeCicca; Gioia Buckley
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations in primary care: an explanatory study among French general practitioners.

Authors:  Jonathan Sicsic; Marc Le Vaillant; Carine Franc
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  A longitudinal examination of a pay-for-performance program for diabetes care: evidence from a natural experiment.

Authors:  Shou-Hsia Cheng; Tai-Ti Lee; Chi-Chen Chen
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Characteristics of women using organized or opportunistic breast cancer screening in France. Analysis of the 2006 French Health, Health Care and Insurance Survey.

Authors:  N Duport
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2012-11-10       Impact factor: 1.019

7.  Enhancing mammography referral in primary care.

Authors:  K E Grady; J P Lemkau; N R Lee; C Caddell
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Is the "practice style" hypothesis relevant for general practitioners? An analysis of antibiotics prescription for acute rhinopharyngitis.

Authors:  Julien Mousquès; Thomas Renaud; Olivier Scemama
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Tim Doran; Catherine Fullwood; Hugh Gravelle; David Reeves; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Urara Hiroeh; Martin Roland
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-07-27       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Interaction terms in nonlinear models.

Authors:  Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Edward C Norton; Bryan Dowd
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.734

View more
  3 in total

1.  Effect of pay-for-performance on cervical cancer screening participation in France.

Authors:  Panayotis Constantinou; Jonathan Sicsic; Carine Franc
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2016-12-22

2.  Payment methods for healthcare providers working in outpatient healthcare settings.

Authors:  Liying Jia; Qingyue Meng; Anthony Scott; Beibei Yuan; Lu Zhang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-01-20

3.  Is the evidence on the effectiveness of pay for performance schemes in healthcare changing? Evidence from a meta-regression analysis.

Authors:  Arezou Zaresani; Anthony Scott
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.