Literature DB >> 9383059

Is function of the Drosophila homeotic gene Ultrabithorax canalized?

G Gibson1, S van Helden.   

Abstract

Genetic variation affecting the expressivity of an amorphic allele of the homeotic gene Ultrabithorax, (Ubx1) was characterized after 11 generations of introgression into 29 different isofemale lines. Heterozygotes display a range of haploinsufficient phenotypes, from overlap with wild-type halteres to dramatic transformations such as a 50% increase in area and the presence of over 20 bristles on the anterior margin of each haltere. In both the wild-type and mutant genetic backgrounds, there is moderate genetic variance and low environmental variance/developmental asymmetry, as expected of a trait under stabilizing selection pressure. Surprisingly, there is little evidence that mutant halteres are more variable than wild-type ones, so it is unclear that haltere development is also canalized. The correlation between wild-type and Ubx haltere size is very low, indicating that interactions among modifiers of Ubx are complex, and in some cases sex-specific. The potential quantitative genetic contributions of homeotic genes to appendage morphology are discussed, noting that population-level effects of variation in key regulatory genes may be prevalent and complex but cannot be readily extrapolated to macroevolutionary diversification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9383059      PMCID: PMC1208240     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  14 in total

1.  A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila.

Authors:  E B Lewis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  MUTANT EXPRESSION AND CANALIZATION.

Authors:  W SCHARLOO
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1964-09-05       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits.

Authors:  D Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Homeotic genes and the regulation and evolution of insect wing number.

Authors:  S B Carroll; S D Weatherbee; J A Langeland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-05-04       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  The genetic basis of quantitative variation: numbers of sensory bristles of Drosophila melanogaster as a model system.

Authors:  T F Mackay
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 11.639

6.  Pleiotropic models of polygenic variation, stabilizing selection, and epistasis.

Authors:  S Gavrilets; G de Jong
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  An analysis of the expressivity of some bithorax transformations.

Authors:  G Morata; S Kerridge
Journal:  Basic Life Sci       Date:  1980

8.  Canalisation of development of scutellar bristles in Drosophila by control of the scute locus.

Authors:  J M Rendel; B L Sheldon; D E Finlay
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1965-12       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Dosage-dependent modifiers of polycomb and antennapedia mutations in Drosophila.

Authors:  J A Kennison; J W Tamkun
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Hox genes and the diversification of insect and crustacean body plans.

Authors:  M Averof; M Akam
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  20 in total

1.  Genotype-by-diet interactions drive metabolic phenotype variation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Laura K Reed; Stephanie Williams; Mastafa Springston; Julie Brown; Kenda Freeman; Christie E DesRoches; Marla B Sokolowski; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The population genetic theory of hidden variation and genetic robustness.

Authors:  Joachim Hermisson; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomic consequences of background effects on scalloped mutant expressivity in the wing of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ian Dworkin; Erin Kennerly; David Tack; Jennifer Hutchinson; Julie Brown; James Mahaffey; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Increase in quantitative variation after exposure to environmental stresses and/or introduction of a major mutation: G x E interaction and epistasis or canalization?

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Intraspecific evolution of the intercellular signaling network underlying a robust developmental system.

Authors:  Josselin Milloz; Fabien Duveau; Isabelle Nuez; Marie-Anne Félix
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and transforming growth factor-beta signaling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ian Dworkin; Greg Gibson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Flexibility in a gene network affecting a simple behavior in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Bruno van Swinderen; Ralph J Greenspan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  Does your gene need a background check? How genetic background impacts the analysis of mutations, genes, and evolution.

Authors:  Christopher H Chandler; Sudarshan Chari; Ian Dworkin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Canalization and developmental stability in the Brachyrrhine mouse.

Authors:  Katherine Elizabeth Willmore; Miriam Leah Zelditch; Nathan Young; Andrew Ah-Seng; Scott Lozanoff; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 10.  Epistasis and quantitative traits: using model organisms to study gene-gene interactions.

Authors:  Trudy F C Mackay
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 53.242

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.