Literature DB >> 16533318

Canalization and developmental stability in the Brachyrrhine mouse.

Katherine Elizabeth Willmore1, Miriam Leah Zelditch, Nathan Young, Andrew Ah-Seng, Scott Lozanoff, Benedikt Hallgrímsson.   

Abstract

The semi-dominant Br mutation affects presphenoid growth, producing the facial retrognathism and globular neurocranial vault that characterize heterozygotes. We analysed the impact of this mutation on skull shape, comparing heterozygotes to wildtype mice, to determine if the effects are skull-wide or confined to the sphenoid region targeted by the mutation. In addition, we examined patterns of variability of shape for the skull as a whole and for three regions (basicranium, face and neurocranium). We found that the Br mice differed significantly from wildtype mice in skull shape in all three regions as well as in the shape of the skull as a whole. However, the significant increases in variance and fluctuating asymmetry were found only in the basicranium of mutant mice. These results suggest that the mutation has a significant effect on the underlying developmental architecture of the skull, which produces an increase in phenotypic variability that is localized to the anatomical region in which the mean phenotype is most dramatically affected. These results suggest that the same developmental mechanisms that produce the change in phenotypic mean also produce the change in variance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16533318      PMCID: PMC2100242          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00527.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  29 in total

Review 1.  Basicranial influence on overall cranial shape.

Authors:  D E Lieberman; O M Pearson; K M Mowbray
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.895

2.  The brachymorph mouse and the developmental-genetic basis for canalization and morphological integration.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Jevon J Y Brown; Alice F Ford-Hutchinson; H David Sheets; Miriam L Zelditch; Frank R Jirik
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution.

Authors:  S L Rutherford; S Lindquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-11-26       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Differential in vitro response to epidermal growth factor by prenatal murine cranial-base chondrocytes.

Authors:  Wenbin Ma; Scott Lozanoff
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.633

5.  Diazinon resistance, fluctuating asymmetry and fitness in the Australian sheep blowfly, lucilia cuprina.

Authors:  J A McKenzie; G M Clarke
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Immunohistochemical localization of Pax2 and associated proteins in the developing kidney of mice with renal hypoplasia.

Authors:  S Lozanoff; J Johnston; W Ma; C Jourdan-Le Saux
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  Spatial and temporal distribution of cellular proliferation in the cranial base of normal and midfacially retrusive mice.

Authors:  W Ma; S Lozanoff
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.414

8.  Developmental instability of the Drosophila wing as an index of genomic perturbation and altered cell proliferation.

Authors:  Vincenzo Trotta; Flavio Garoia; Daniela Guerra; Maria Cristina Pezzoli; Daniela Grifoni; Sandro Cavicchi
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Do precocial mammals develop at a faster rate? A comparison of rates of skull development in Sigmodon fulviventer and Mus musculus domesticus.

Authors:  Miriam Leah Zelditch; Barbara L Lundrigan; H David Sheets; Theodore Garland
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.411

10.  Midfacial retrusion in adult brachyrrhine mice.

Authors:  S Lozanoff
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1993
View more
  11 in total

1.  The morphology of the mouse masticatory musculature.

Authors:  Hester Baverstock; Nathan S Jeffery; Samuel N Cobb
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Morphological comparison of the craniofacial phenotypes of mouse models expressing the Apert FGFR2 S252W mutation in neural crest- or mesoderm-derived tissues.

Authors:  Yann Heuzé; Nandini Singh; Claudio Basilico; Ethylin Wang Jabs; Greg Holmes; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Short-faced mice and developmental interactions between the brain and the face.

Authors:  Julia C Boughner; Stephen Wat; Virginia M Diewert; Nathan M Young; Leon W Browder; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Phenotypic variability and craniofacial dysmorphology: increased shape variance in a mouse model for cleft lip.

Authors:  Trish E Parsons; Erika Kristensen; Lynnette Hornung; Virginia M Diewert; Steven K Boyd; Rebecca Z German; Benedikt Hallgrímsson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Trisomy 21 and facial developmental instability.

Authors:  John M Starbuck; Theodore M Cole; Roger H Reeves; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Exploring the effects of gene dosage on mandible shape in mice as a model for studying the genetic basis of natural variation.

Authors:  Louis Boell; Luisa F Pallares; Claude Brodski; Yiping Chen; Jan L Christian; Youssef A Kousa; Pia Kuss; Sylvia Nelsen; Orna Novikov; Brian C Schutte; Ying Wang; Diethard Tautz
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Increased fluctuating asymmetry in a naturally occurring hybrid zone between the stick insects Bacillus rossius rossius and Bacillus rossius redtenbacheri.

Authors:  Ditte Demontis; Cino Pertoldi; Marco Passamonti; Valerio Scali
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.857

8.  Nasal bone shape is under complex epistatic genetic control in mouse interspecific recombinant congenic strains.

Authors:  Gaétan Burgio; Michel Baylac; Evelyne Heyer; Xavier Montagutelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Can morphotaxa be assessed with photographs? Estimating the accuracy of two-dimensional cranial geometric morphometrics for the study of threatened populations of African monkeys.

Authors:  Andrea Cardini; Yvonne A de Jong; Thomas M Butynski
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 2.227

10.  A single basis for developmental buffering of Drosophila wing shape.

Authors:  Casper J Breuker; James S Patterson; Christian Peter Klingenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2006-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.