Literature DB >> 9375538

Postural load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures.

A Aarås1, K I Fostervold, O Ro, M Thoresen, S Larsen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the postural load during VDU work in the following work postures: (1) Supporting and not supporting the forearms on the table top, (2) Sitting and standing positions, and (3) Sightline to the centre of the screen at an angle of 15 degrees and 30 degrees below the horizontal. The muscle load from the upper part of musculus trapezius and from the lumbar part of musculus erector spinae (L3 level) was measured by electromyography (EMG). Postural angles of head, upper arm and back were measured by inclinometers. The load on m. trapezius when using the keyboard was significantly less in sitting with supported forearms compared to sitting and standing without forearm support. Further, the time and number of periods when the trapezius load was below 1% MVC was significantly greater with support versus no support. The load on the right erector spinae lumbalis was also significantly less and the time when the load was below 1% MVC was significantly longer in a sitting work position with support versus standing without support. In addition, when using a mouse supporting the forearms reduced the static trapezius load in sitting. The results from this study document clearly the importance of giving the operator the possibility of supporting the forearms on the table top.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9375538     DOI: 10.1080/001401397187496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  19 in total

1.  Work related and individual predictors for incident neck pain among office employees working with video display units.

Authors:  T Korhonen; R Ketola; R Toivonen; R Luukkonen; M Häkkänen; E Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Expert assessment of physical ergonomics at video-display unit workstations: repeatability, validity and responsiveness to changes.

Authors:  Ritva Ketola; Risto Toivonen; Ritva Luukkonen; Esa-Pekka Takala; Eira Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-04-30       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  The relative contribution of work exposure, leisure time exposure, and individual characteristics in the onset of arm-wrist-hand and neck-shoulder symptoms among office workers.

Authors:  Maaike A Huysmans; Stefan Ijmker; Birgitte M Blatter; Dirk L Knol; Willem van Mechelen; Paulien M Bongers; Allard J van der Beek
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  U Matern; M Faist; K Kehl; C Giebmeyer; G Buess
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-01-10       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Effects of a proximity-sensing feedback chair on head, shoulder, and trunk postures when working at a visual display terminal.

Authors:  Won-gyu Yoo; Chung-hwi Yi; Min-hee Kim
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

6.  A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effects of two workstation interventions on upper body pain and incident musculoskeletal disorders among computer operators.

Authors:  D M Rempel; N Krause; R Goldberg; D Benner; M Hudes; G U Goldner
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Experimental pain leads to reorganisation of trapezius electromyography during computer work with active and passive pauses.

Authors:  Afshin Samani; Andreas Holtermann; Karen Søgaard; Pascal Madeleine
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Examining the low, high and range measures of muscle activity amplitudes in symptomatic and asymptomatic computer users performing typing and mousing tasks.

Authors:  Grace P Y Szeto; Leon M Straker; Peter B O'Sullivan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  The effect of walking while typing on neck/shoulder patterns.

Authors:  Larissa M Fedorowich; Kim Emery; Julie N Côté
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-04-05       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Self-reported workplace related ergonomic conditions as prognostic factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: the "BIT" follow up study on office workers.

Authors:  B Juul-Kristensen; C Jensen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.