Literature DB >> 15723884

Self-reported workplace related ergonomic conditions as prognostic factors for musculoskeletal symptoms: the "BIT" follow up study on office workers.

B Juul-Kristensen1, C Jensen.   

Abstract

AIMS: To identify prognostic ergonomic and work technique factors for musculoskeletal symptoms among office workers and in a subgroup with highly monotonous repetitive computer work.
METHODS: A baseline questionnaire was delivered to 5033 office workers in 11 Danish companies in the first months of 1999, and a follow up questionnaire was mailed in the last months of 2000 to 3361 respondents. A subgroup with highly monotonous repetitive computer work was formed including those that were repeating the same movements and/or tasks for at least 75% of the work time. The questionnaire contained questions on ergonomic factors and factors related to work technique. The outcome variables were based on the frequency of musculoskeletal symptoms during the last 12 months. Logistic regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors for symptoms in the three body regions.
RESULTS: In total, 39%, 47%, and 51% of the symptomatic subjects had a reduced frequency of symptom days in the neck/shoulder, low back, or elbow/hand region, respectively. In all regions more men than women had reduced symptoms. In the multivariate logistic regression analyses, working no more than 75% of the work time with the computer was a prognostic factor for musculoskeletal symptoms in the neck/shoulder and elbow/hand, and a high influence on the speed of work was a prognostic factor for symptoms in the low back. In the subgroup with highly monotonous repetitive computer work, the odds ratios of the prognostic factors were similar to those for the whole group of office workers.
CONCLUSION: When organising computer work it is important to allow for physical variation with other work tasks, thereby avoiding working with the computer during all the work time, and further to consider the worker's own influence on the speed of work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15723884      PMCID: PMC1740969          DOI: 10.1136/oem.2004.013920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Environ Med        ISSN: 1351-0711            Impact factor:   4.402


  29 in total

Review 1.  Is sitting-while-at-work associated with low back pain? A systematic, critical literature review.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; C Leboeuf-Yde; S Lings; E H Corder
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Effects of ergonomic intervention in work with video display units.

Authors:  Ritva Ketola; Risto Toivonen; Marketta Häkkänen; Ritva Luukkonen; Esa-Pekka Takala; Eira Viikari-Juntura
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 3.  Risk factors for musculoskeletal disorders among computer users.

Authors:  P Tittiranonda; S Burastero; D Rempel
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1999 Jan-Mar

4.  Effects of arm support on shoulder and arm muscle activity during sedentary work.

Authors:  Y Feng; W Grooten; P Wretenberg; U P Arborelius
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Musculoskeletal problems in VDT work: a review.

Authors:  J B Carter; E W Banister
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Disc pressure measurements.

Authors:  A L Nachemson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1981 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The association between physical workload and low back pain clouded by the "healthy worker" effect: population-based cross-sectional and 5-year prospective questionnaire study.

Authors:  J Hartvigsen; L S Bakketeig; C Leboeuf-Yde; M Engberg; T Lauritzen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Risk factors in the onset of neck/shoulder pain in a prospective study of workers in industrial and service companies.

Authors:  J H Andersen; A Kaergaard; S Mikkelsen; U F Jensen; P Frost; J P Bonde; N Fallentin; J F Thomsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  A prospective study of low back pain in a general population. II. Location, character, aggravating and relieving factors.

Authors:  F Biering-Sørensen
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1983

10.  Development of neck and hand-wrist symptoms in relation to duration of computer use at work.

Authors:  Chris Jensen
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 5.024

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  Longitudinal evidence for the association between work-related physical exposures and neck and/or shoulder complaints: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julia Mayer; Thomas Kraus; Elke Ochsmann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Computer use and habitual spinal posture in Australian adolescents.

Authors:  Leon M Straker; Peter B O'Sullivan; Anne Smith; Mark Perry
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Selected questions on biomechanical exposures for surveillance of upper-limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Alexis Descatha; Yves Roquelaure; Bradley Evanoff; Isabelle Niedhammer; Jean François Chastang; Camille Mariot; Catherine Ha; Ellen Imbernon; Marcel Goldberg; Annette Leclerc
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 3.015

4.  The influence of work-related exposures on the prognosis of neck/shoulder pain.

Authors:  Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas Grooten; Marie Mulder; Malin Josephson; Lars Alfredsson; Christina Wiktorin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-25       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The influence of working conditions and individual factors on the incidence of neck and upper limb symptoms among professional computer users.

Authors:  Ewa Wigaeus Tornqvist; Mats Hagberg; Maud Hagman; Eva Hansson Risberg; Allan Toomingas
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Ergonomic Microscope: Need of the Hour.

Authors:  Anish Ashok Gupta; Shubhangi Ashok Mhaske; Malik Ajaz Ahmad; Monal B Yuwanati; Shweta Prabhu; Nilesh Pardhe
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-05-01

7.  Workstyle and Musculoskeletal Discomfort (MSD): Exploring the Influence of Work Culture in Malaysia.

Authors:  Ismail Maakip; Tessa Keegel; Jodi Oakman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2015-12

Review 8.  The incremental effect of psychosocial workplace factors on the development of neck and shoulder disorders: a systematic review of longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Silvia Kraatz; Jessica Lang; Thomas Kraus; Eva Münster; Elke Ochsmann
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Neck and shoulder complaints in computer workers and associated easy to assess occupational factors--a large-scale cross-sectional multivariate study.

Authors:  Philippe Kiss; Marc De Meester; André Kruse; Brigitte Chavée; Lutgart Braeckman
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  The relationship between upper extremity musculoskeletal symptoms attributed to work and risk factors in office workers.

Authors:  Prawit Janwantanakul; Praneet Pensri; Wiroj Jiamjarasrangsi; Thanes Sinsongsook
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 3.015

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.