D M Rempel1, N Krause, R Goldberg, D Benner, M Hudes, G U Goldner. 1. Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94804, USA. drempel@itsa.ucsf.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Call centre work with computers is associated with increased rates of upper body pain and musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: This one year, randomised controlled intervention trial evaluated the effects of a wide forearm support surface and a trackball on upper body pain severity and incident musculoskeletal disorders among 182 call centre operators at a large healthcare company. Participants were randomised to receive (1) ergonomics training only, (2) training plus a trackball, (3) training plus a forearm support, or (4) training plus a trackball and forearm support. Outcome measures were weekly pain severity scores and diagnosis of incident musculoskeletal disorder in the upper extremities or the neck/shoulder region based on physical examination performed by a physician blinded to intervention. Analyses using Cox proportional hazard models and linear regression models adjusted for demographic factors, baseline pain levels, and psychosocial job factors. RESULTS:Post-intervention, 63 participants were diagnosed with one or more incident musculoskeletal disorders. Hazard rate ratios showed a protective effect of the armboard for neck/shoulder disorders (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.97) after adjusting for baseline pain levels and demographic and psychosocial factors. The armboard also significantly reduced neck/shoulder pain (p = 0.01) and right upper extremity pain (p = 0.002) in comparison to the control group. A return-on-investment model predicted a full return of armboard and installation costs within 10.6 months. CONCLUSION: Providing a large forearm support combined with ergonomic training is an effective intervention to prevent upper body musculoskeletal disorders and reduce upper body pain associated with computer work among call centre employees.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Call centre work with computers is associated with increased rates of upper body pain and musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS: This one year, randomised controlled intervention trial evaluated the effects of a wide forearm support surface and a trackball on upper body pain severity and incident musculoskeletal disorders among 182 call centre operators at a large healthcare company. Participants were randomised to receive (1) ergonomics training only, (2) training plus a trackball, (3) training plus a forearm support, or (4) training plus a trackball and forearm support. Outcome measures were weekly pain severity scores and diagnosis of incident musculoskeletal disorder in the upper extremities or the neck/shoulder region based on physical examination performed by a physician blinded to intervention. Analyses using Cox proportional hazard models and linear regression models adjusted for demographic factors, baseline pain levels, and psychosocial job factors. RESULTS: Post-intervention, 63 participants were diagnosed with one or more incident musculoskeletal disorders. Hazard rate ratios showed a protective effect of the armboard for neck/shoulder disorders (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.97) after adjusting for baseline pain levels and demographic and psychosocial factors. The armboard also significantly reduced neck/shoulder pain (p = 0.01) and right upper extremity pain (p = 0.002) in comparison to the control group. A return-on-investment model predicted a full return of armboard and installation costs within 10.6 months. CONCLUSION: Providing a large forearm support combined with ergonomic training is an effective intervention to prevent upper body musculoskeletal disorders and reduce upper body pain associated with computer work among call centre employees.
Authors: Christina Funch Lassen; Sigurd Mikkelsen; Ann Isabel Kryger; Lars P A Brandt; Erik Overgaard; Jane Frølund Thomsen; Imogen Vilstrup; Johan Hviid Andersen Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Johan Hviid Andersen; Jane Froelund Thomsen; Erik Overgaard; Christina Funch Lassen; Lars Peter Andreas Brandt; Imogen Vilstrup; Ann Isabel Kryger; Sigurd Mikkelsen Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-06-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: A I Kryger; J H Andersen; C F Lassen; L P A Brandt; I Vilstrup; E Overgaard; J F Thomsen; S Mikkelsen Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.402
Authors: Maaike A Huysmans; Stefan Ijmker; Birgitte M Blatter; Dirk L Knol; Willem van Mechelen; Paulien M Bongers; Allard J van der Beek Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2011-10-29 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Ewa Wigaeus Tornqvist; Mats Hagberg; Maud Hagman; Eva Hansson Risberg; Allan Toomingas Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Carol A Kennedy; Benjamin C Amick; Jack T Dennerlein; Shelley Brewer; Starly Catli; Renee Williams; Consol Serra; Fred Gerr; Emma Irvin; Quenby Mahood; Al Franzblau; Dwayne Van Eerd; Bradley Evanoff; David Rempel Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2010-06