Literature DB >> 9373067

Multifactorial analysis of lung cancer dose-response relationships for workers at the Mayak nuclear enterprise.

Z B Tokarskaya1, N D Okladnikova, Z D Belyaeva, E G Drozhko.   

Abstract

Dose-response relationships for alpha-radiation-induced lung cancers (adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma and small cell carcinoma) were developed by multifactorial analysis using data for Mayak nuclear enterprise workers chronically exposed by inhalation to 239Pu. The three most important lung cancer risk factors (smoking, plutonium incorporation, and external gamma irradiation), out of six factors previously identified, were used. Relative risks (odds ratios) were determined for 500 nuclear enterprise workers (162 cancer cases, 338 control) for different dose levels using a case-control study design and logistic regression. A threshold at about 3.7 kBq or 0.80 Gy was discovered for incorporated plutonium, which is satisfactorily described by linear-quadratic and quadratic models. Excess relative risk was 0.020 kBq(-2) and 0.97 Gy(-2). This quadratic function was mainly due to adenocarcinoma. A trend for decreasing risk was noted for the lowest levels of plutonium incorporation, near permissible level. No clear-cut dose-response relationship for lung cancer induction by chronic external gamma irradiation was obtained. Lung cancer induction by cigarette smoking had a linear dependence: smoking of one pack of papiroses (a type of Russian cigarette) per day for 5 y increases the lung cancer risk twofold. The effect was most clearly manifested for squamous-cell carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9373067     DOI: 10.1097/00004032-199712000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  13 in total

1.  Is it really this simple?

Authors:  Martin Charron; Brian C Lentle
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2003-09-16

2.  A rebuttal to chiropractic radiologists' view of the 50-year-old, linear-no-threshold radiation risk model.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Donald D Harrison; Deed E Harrison; Jason W Haas
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2006-09

3.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

4.  Mechanistic basis for nonlinear dose-response relationships for low-dose radiation-induced stochastic effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Yohannes Tesfaigzi; Helmut Schöllnberger; Vernon Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01

Review 5.  Systematic review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological evidence in the 1900s relating smoking to lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter N Lee; Barbara A Forey; Katharine J Coombs
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2012-09-03       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Potential treatment of inflammatory and proliferative diseases by ultra-low doses of ionizing radiations.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.658

7.  It's time for a new low-dose-radiation risk assessment paradigm--one that acknowledges hormesis.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-09-30       Impact factor: 2.658

8.  Low-dose-radiation stimulated natural chemical and biological protection against lung cancer.

Authors:  B R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.658

9.  Low-dose radiation and genotoxic chemicals can protect against stochastic biological effects.

Authors:  Bobby R Scott; Dale M Walker; Vernon E Walker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2004-07

10.  Health Effects of High Radon Environments in Central Europe: Another Test for the LNT Hypothesis?

Authors:  Klaus Becker
Journal:  Nonlinearity Biol Toxicol Med       Date:  2003-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.