Literature DB >> 9372758

Maintaining a hip registry for 25 years. Mayo Clinic experience.

D J Berry1, M Kessler, B F Morrey.   

Abstract

A computerized database was established for all total joint replacements done at the authors' institution. To date the registry contains information on more than 56,000 arthroplasties of which more than 30,000 involve the hip. The registry was designed to determine the effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty as a function of implant design, surgical technique, and patient selection. Furthermore, by maintaining and updating the patient record, data regarding success or anticipated failure could be communicated to the patient. Finally, this resource would provide reliable information that could be communicated to the orthopedic community. Patients are routinely evaluated at 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively and at 5-year intervals thereafter by examination or letter or telephone questionnaire. Followup of patients at each interval is approximately 95%. Patients are more likely to respond by questionnaire (rather than be seen in person) if they are older, if a longer time has elapsed since surgery, or if they live a long distance from the clinic. Data are collected by five full time employees including computer and statistical support specifically assigned to the project. The annual joint registry budget is in excess of $400,000. Unfortunately, the future of this endeavor is challenged by the needs to: (1) show cost effectiveness of the activity; (2) update and validate outcomes instruments used as input into the database; and (3) maintain satisfactory followup rates in a medical economic environment that often discourages patient return visits or local assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9372758     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199711000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  42 in total

1.  Does an increase in modularity improve the outcomes of total shoulder replacement? Comparison across design generations.

Authors:  Bradley Schoch; Jean-David Werthel; Cathy Schleck; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  First hip arthroplasty register in Italy: 55,000 cases and 7 year follow-up.

Authors:  S Stea; B Bordini; M De Clerico; K Petropulacos; A Toni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Restoration of the hip center during THA performed for protrusio acetabuli is associated with better implant survival.

Authors:  Yaser M K Baghdadi; A Noelle Larson; Rafael J Sierra
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Arthroplasty registries around the world: valuable sources of hip implant revision risk data.

Authors:  Richard E Hughes; Aditi Batra; Brian R Hallstrom
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

5.  Is shoulder arthroplasty an option for charcot arthropathy?

Authors:  Bradley Schoch; Jean-David Werthel; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield; Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Cardiopulmonary complications after primary shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Semin Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 5.532

7.  Patient factors predict periprosthetic fractures after revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Matthew R Jensen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Periprosthetic fractures associated with primary total shoulder arthroplasty and primary humeral head replacement: a thirty-three-year study.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; John Sperling; Cathy Schleck; William Harmsen; Robert Cofield
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in diabetic patients as assessed by peri-operative A1C.

Authors:  Joseph M Statz; Eric R Wagner; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-03-18       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Application and surgical technique of total knee arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide registers.

Authors:  Ines Vielgut; Norbert Kastner; Karin Pichler; Lukas Holzer; Mathias Glehr; Gerald Gruber; Andreas Leithner; Gerold Labek; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.