Literature DB >> 9372291

Manual interception of moving targets. II. On-line control of overlapping submovements.

D Lee1, N L Port, A P Georgopoulos.   

Abstract

We studied the kinematic characteristics of arm movements and their relation to a stimulus moving with a wide range of velocity and acceleration. The target traveled at constant acceleration, constant deceleration, or constant velocity for 0.5-2.0 s, until it arrived at a location where it was required to be intercepted. For fast moving targets, subjects produced single movements with symmetrical, bell-shaped velocity profiles. In contrast, for slowly moving targets, hand velocity profiles displayed multiple peaks, which suggests a control mechanism that produces a series of discrete submovements according to characteristics of target motion. To analyze how temporal and spatial aspects of these submovements are influenced by target motion, we decomposed the vertical hand velocity profiles into bell-shaped velocity pulses according to the minimum-jerk model. The number of submovements was roughly proportional to the movement time, resulting in a relatively constant submovement frequency (approximately 2.5 Hz). On the other hand, the submovement onset asynchrony showed significantly more variability than the intersubmovement interval, indicating that the submovement onset was delayed more following a submovement with a longer duration. Examination of submovement amplitude and its relation to target motion revealed that the subjects achieved interception mainly by producing a series of submovements that would keep the displacement of the hand proportional to the first-order estimate of target position at the end of each submovement along the axis of hand movement. Finally, we did not find any evidence that information regarding target acceleration is properly utilized in the production of submovements.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9372291     DOI: 10.1007/pl00005770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Beside the point: motor adaptation without feedback-based error correction in task-irrelevant conditions.

Authors:  Sydney Y Schaefer; Iris L Shelly; Kurt A Thoroughman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Base on balls for the Chapman strategy: reassessing Brouwer, Brenner, and Smeets (2002).

Authors:  Frank T J M Zaal; Raoul M Bongers; Gert-Jan Pepping; Reinoud J Bootsma
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Deciding when and how to correct a movement: discrete submovements as a decision making process.

Authors:  Alon Fishbach; Stephane A Roy; Christina Bastianen; Lee E Miller; James C Houk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Systematic changes in the duration and precision of interception in response to variation of amplitude and effector size.

Authors:  James R Tresilian; Annaliese Plooy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Kinematic properties of on-line error corrections in the monkey.

Authors:  Alon Fishbach; Stephane A Roy; Christina Bastianen; Lee E Miller; James C Houk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Intrinsic joint kinematic planning. II: hand-path predictions based on a Listing's plane constraint.

Authors:  D G Liebermann; A Biess; C C A M Gielen; T Flash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Use of visual information in the correction of interceptive actions.

Authors:  Luis A Teixeira; Romeo Chua; Paul Nagelkerke; Ian M Franks
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

Authors:  Myrka Zago; Joseph McIntyre; Patrice Senot; Francesco Lacquaniti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Attentional interference facilitates skilled anticipatory action.

Authors:  Stefano Valenzi; Marta Olivetti-Belardinelli; Cees van Leeuwen
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.