Literature DB >> 17297548

Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Daniel J Goble1, Susan H Brown.   

Abstract

Whereas the majority of studies regarding upper limb asymmetries in motor performance have focused on preferred arm dominance for producing motor output, studies exploring the role of sensory feedback have suggested that the preferred and non-preferred arms are specialized for different aspects of movement. A recent study by Goble et al. (2006) found evidence of a non-preferred left arm (and presumably right hemisphere) proprioceptive dominance for a target matching task that required subjects to both memorize and transfer across hemispheres proprioceptive target information. This paradigm contrasted previous studies of proprioceptive matching asymmetry that explored only memory-based matching and produced equivocal results. The purpose of the present study, therefore, was to examine task-dependent asymmetries in proprioceptive matching performance, including differences related to active versus passive presentation of the matching target. It was found that the non-preferred left arm of right handers matched target elbow angles more accurately than the preferred arm, but only in the matching condition that required both memory and interhemispheric transfer. Task-dependent asymmetries were not affected by the mode of target presentation and assessment of matching kinematics revealed differences in strategy for both the speed and smoothness of targeted movements. Taken together, these results suggest that the non-preferred arm/hemisphere system is specialized for the processing of movement-related proprioceptive feedback.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17297548     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0890-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  91 in total

1.  The expression of manual asymmetries following extensive training of the nondominant hand: a kinematic perspective.

Authors:  M Heath; E A Roy
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2000 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Posterior corpus callosum and interhemispheric transfer of somatosensory information: an fMRI and neuropsychological study of a partially callosotomized patient.

Authors:  M Fabri; G Polonara; M Del Pesce; A Quattrini; U Salvolini; T Manzoni
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Accommodation to increased accuracy demands by the right and left hands.

Authors:  J I Todor; J Cisneros
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  The effect of accuracy constraints on three-dimensional movement kinematics.

Authors:  T E Milner; M M Ijaz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 6.  Kinesthetic sensibility.

Authors:  D I McCloskey
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Amplitude, position, timing and velocity as cues in reproduction of movement.

Authors:  R G Marteniuk; K W Shields; S Campbell
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1972-08

8.  The coordination of arm movements: an experimentally confirmed mathematical model.

Authors:  T Flash; N Hogan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude.

Authors:  Caroline J Ketcham; Rachael D Seidler; Arend W A Van Gemmert; George E Stelmach
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Hand preference and age in the United States.

Authors:  A N Gilbert; C J Wysocki
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  44 in total

1.  Proprioceptively guided reaching movements in 3D space: effects of age, task complexity and handedness.

Authors:  T S Schaap; T I Gonzales; T W J Janssen; S H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Compromised encoding of proprioceptively determined joint angles in older adults: the role of working memory and attentional load.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Marianne A Mousigian; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Ageing of internal models: from a continuous to an intermittent proprioceptive control of movement.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2012-05-26

4.  Eye-hand coordination of symmetric bimanual reaching tasks: temporal aspects.

Authors:  Divya Srinivasan; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The neural control of bimanual movements in the elderly: Brain regions exhibiting age-related increases in activity, frequency-induced neural modulation, and task-specific compensatory recruitment.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; James P Coxon; Annouchka Van Impe; Jeroen De Vos; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Proprioceptive target matching asymmetries in left-handed individuals.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Brittany C Noble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Position sense asymmetry.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Presbypropria: the effects of physiological ageing on proprioceptive control.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Isabelle Olivier; Olivier Chenu; Vincent Nougier
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2011-08-18

9.  The neural basis of central proprioceptive processing in older versus younger adults: an important sensory role for right putamen.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; James P Coxon; Annouchka Van Impe; Monique Geurts; Wim Van Hecke; Stefan Sunaert; Nicole Wenderoth; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning.

Authors:  Jeremy D Wong; Elizabeth T Wilson; Paul L Gribble
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.