Literature DB >> 9371390

Evaluation of follow-up investigations in osteosarcoma patients: suggestions for an effective follow-up program.

D Körholz1, J Verheyen, H F Kemperdick, U Göbel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURE: Follow-up programs for cancer patients aim at improving the overall prognosis by early detection of relapse. In this study, follow-up data from 72 osteosarcoma patients were received in order to determine the value of clinical examination (CE), lung CT-scan (CTL), chest X-ray (CXR), local X-ray (LXR), and bone scintigraphy (BS) in the detection of tumor recurrence. PROCEDURE: Twenty-eight of 72 osteosarcoma patients presented with a total of 61 relapse sites. A continuous remission after relapse treatment could be achieved in 2/16 patients with first lung metastases, in 2/6 patients with local relapse, and in 3/19 patients with more than one lung metastasis. More than 90% of all relapses occurred within 3 years off primary therapy, respectively, within 3 years after detection of relapse. Local relapse and lung metastases were primarily diagnosed by CXR, CTL and CE. BS was the most important investigation to detect distant metastases. No relapse was found by routine X-ray of the primary tumor site.
CONCLUSIONS: To improve efficacy of follow-up programs and to reduce radiation load of nonrelapsed patients, the prognosis of patients with lung metastases or local recurrences and the time of high risk for a relapse should be taken into consideration. Since the number of patients who benefit from relapse therapy is still low, it remains to be shown whether an increased frequency of lung CT-scans or MRIs of the primary tumor site will improve early detection of relapse; and if so, whether that will enhance the chance for successful relapse treatment. CXR, CTL and CE should be performed routinely for at least 3 years after completion of therapy or relapse diagnosis. In contrast, BS and LXR appear not to be useful as routine investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9371390     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-911x(199801)30:1<52::aid-mpo13>3.0.co;2-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol        ISSN: 0098-1532


  5 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging of sarcomas with FDG PET.

Authors:  Humberto Mendoza; Anton Nosov; Neeta Pandit-Taskar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 2.128

2.  Developing an Evidence-based Followup Schedule for Bone Sarcomas Based on Local Recurrence and Metastatic Progression.

Authors:  Cara Cipriano; Anthony M Griffin; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Does intensity of surveillance affect survival after surgery for sarcomas? Results of a randomized noninferiority trial.

Authors:  Ajay Puri; Ashish Gulia; Rohini Hawaldar; Priya Ranganathan; Rajendra A Badwe
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Variations of Surveillance Practice for Patients with Bone Sarcoma: A Survey of Australian Sarcoma Clinicians.

Authors:  Jeremy Lewin; Kate Thompson; Susie Bae; Jayesh Desai; Robyn Strong; Denise Caruso; Deborah Howell; Alan Herschtal; Michael Sullivan; Lisa Orme
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2017-02-28

5.  A systematic review of evidence for and against routine surveillance imaging after completing treatment for childhood extracranial solid tumors.

Authors:  Jessica E Morgan; Ruth Walker; Melissa Harden; Robert S Phillips
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 4.452

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.