Literature DB >> 24249538

Does intensity of surveillance affect survival after surgery for sarcomas? Results of a randomized noninferiority trial.

Ajay Puri1, Ashish Gulia, Rohini Hawaldar, Priya Ranganathan, Rajendra A Badwe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether current postoperative surveillance regimes result in improved overall survival (OS) of patients with extremity sarcomas is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We hypothesized that a less intensive followup protocol would not be inferior to the conventional followup protocol in terms of OS. We (1) assessed OS of patients to determine if less intensive followup regimens led to worsened survival and asked (2) whether chest radiograph followup group was inferior to CT scan followup group in detecting pulmonary metastasis; and (3) whether less frequent (6-monthly) followup interval was inferior to more frequent (3-monthly) followup in detecting pulmonary metastasis and local recurrence.
METHODS: A prospective randomized single-center noninferiority trial was conducted between January 2006 and June 2010. On the basis of 3-year survival of 60% with intensive, more frequent followup, 500 nonmetastatic patients were randomized to demonstrate noninferiority by a margin (delta) of 10% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.36). The primary end point was OS at 3 years. The secondary objective was to compare disease-free survival (DFS) (time to recurrence) at 3 years. At minimum followup of 30 months (median, 42 months; range, 30-81 months), 178 deaths were documented.
RESULTS: Three-year OS and DFS for all patients was 67% and 52%, respectively. Three-year OS was 67% and 66% in chest radiography and CT groups, respectively (HR, 0.9; upper 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.13). DFS rate was 54% and 49% in chest radiography and CT groups, respectively (HR, 0.82; upper 90% CI, 0.97). Three-year OS was 64% and 69% in 6-monthly and 3-monthly groups, respectively (HR, 1.2; upper 90% CI, 1.47). DFS was 51% and 52% in 6-monthly and 3-monthly groups, respectively (HR, 1.01; upper 90% CI, 1.2). Almost 90% of local recurrences were identified by patients themselves.
CONCLUSIONS: Inexpensive imaging detects the vast majority of recurrent disease in patients with sarcoma without deleterious effects on eventual outcomes. Patient education regarding self-examination will detect most instances of local recurrence although this was not directly assessed in this study. Although less frequent visits adequately detected metastasis and local recurrence, this trial could not conclusively demonstrate noninferiority in OS for a 6-monthly interval of followup visits against 3-monthly visits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24249538      PMCID: PMC3971232          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-013-3385-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  Bending the cost curve in cancer care.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; Bruce E Hillner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Evaluation of follow-up investigations in osteosarcoma patients: suggestions for an effective follow-up program.

Authors:  D Körholz; J Verheyen; H F Kemperdick; U Göbel
Journal:  Med Pediatr Oncol       Date:  1998-01

3.  Follow-up after primary treatment of soft tissue sarcoma of extremities: impact of frequency of follow-up imaging on disease-specific survival.

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Chou; Chun-Yu Liu; Wei-Ming Chen; Tain-Hsiung Chen; Paul Chih-Hsueh Chen; Hung-Ta Hondar Wu; Hong-Jen Chiou; Cheng-Ying Shiau; Yu-Chung Wu; Chien-Lin Liu; Ta-Chung Chao; Cheng-Hwai Tzeng; Chueh-Chuan Yen
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Primary extremity sarcoma: what is the appropriate follow-up?

Authors:  B P Whooley; J F Gibbs; M M Mooney; B E McGrath; W G Kraybill
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Current follow-up strategies after potentially curative resection of extremity sarcomas: results of a survey of the members of the society of surgical oncology.

Authors:  A L Beitler; K S Virgo; F E Johnson; J F Gibbs; W G Kraybill
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Prognostic value of computed tomography for monitoring pulmonary metastases in soft tissue sarcoma patients after surgical management: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hwan Seong Cho; Il-Hyung Park; Won Ju Jeong; Ilkyu Han; Han-Soo Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Patient surveillance after treatment for soft-tissue sarcoma.

Authors:  Frank E Johnson; Keita Sakata; Suchira Sarkar; Riccardo A Audisio; William G Kraybill; John F Gibbs; Alan L Beitler; Katherine S Virgo
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 5.650

8.  How long should we follow patients with soft tissue sarcomas?

Authors:  Chigusa Sawamura; Seiichi Matsumoto; Takashi Shimoji; Atsushi Okawa; Keisuke Ae
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 9.  The follow-up of breast cancer.

Authors:  Leisha A Emens; Nancy E Davidson
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.929

10.  Extremity soft tissue sarcomas: analysis of prognostic variables in 300 cases and evaluation of tumor necrosis as a factor in stratifying higher-grade sarcomas.

Authors:  E E Lack; S M Steinberg; D E White; T Kinsella; E Glatstein; A E Chang; S A Rosenberg
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 3.454

View more
  36 in total

1.  A Case Report on Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Vivek Verma; Ashish Gulia; Ajay Puri
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-02-01

2.  CORR Insights®: Developing an Evidence-Based Followup Schedule for Bone Sarcomas Based on Local Recurrence and Metastatic Progression.

Authors:  Cynthia L Emory
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Comparison of local recurrence with conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity.

Authors:  Michael R Folkert; Samuel Singer; Murray F Brennan; Deborah Kuk; Li-Xuan Qin; Wendy K Kobayashi; Aimee M Crago; Kaled M Alektiar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  CORR Insights®: Synovial Sarcoma Is Not Associated With a Higher Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis Compared With Other Soft Tissue Sarcomas.

Authors:  David D Greenberg
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  [Surveillance in patients with bone sarcomas. When, how, and for how long?].

Authors:  H R Dürr; P-U Tunn; Y Bakhshai
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Lung Surveillance Strategy for High-Grade Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Chest X-Ray or CT Scan?

Authors:  Adriana C Gamboa; Cecilia G Ethun; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Joseph Lipscomb; George A Poultsides; Valerie Grignol; J Harrison Howard; T Clark Gamblin; Kevin K Roggin; Konstantinos Votanopoulos; Ryan C Fields; Shishir K Maithel; Keith A Delman; Kenneth Cardona
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Pulmonary Surveillance Strategies Following Sarcoma Excision Vary Among Orthopedic Oncologists: A Survey of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society.

Authors:  Zachary Ries; C Parker Gibbs; Mark T Scarborough; Benjamin J Miller
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2016

8.  Moving Forward Through Consensus: A Modified Delphi Approach to Determine the Top Research Priorities in Orthopaedic Oncology.

Authors:  Patricia Jacqueline Schneider; Nathan Evaniew; Paula McKay; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Designing a Rational Follow-Up Schedule for Patients with Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

Authors:  David A J Wilson; Aaron Gazendam; Julia Visgauss; David Perrin; Anthony M Griffin; Peter W Chung; Charles N Catton; David Shultz; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Developing an Evidence-based Followup Schedule for Bone Sarcomas Based on Local Recurrence and Metastatic Progression.

Authors:  Cara Cipriano; Anthony M Griffin; Peter C Ferguson; Jay S Wunder
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.