PURPOSE: To compare the actual and expected refractive errors after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation alone with those after IOL implantation with simultaneous vitrectomy. SETTING: Shinjo Eye Clinic, Miyazaki, Japan. METHOD: One hundred thirty-six eyes had cataract extraction and implantation of a single-piece IOL using a frown incision, continuous annular anterior capsule tear, phacoemulsification, and intracapsular lens fixation. Thirty-six eyes also had vitrectomy. RESULTS: Mean postoperative refractive error was 0.55 diopter (D) +/- 1.34 (SD) in eyes having no vitrectomy and 0.04 +/- 1.24 D in those having vitrectomy. The difference between groups was statistically significant (P = .047; t-test). CONCLUSION: The refraction after simultaneous IOL implantation and vitrectomy shifted toward myopia by a mean of 0.50 D compared with that after IOL implantation alone.
PURPOSE: To compare the actual and expected refractive errors after intraocular lens (IOL) implantation alone with those after IOL implantation with simultaneous vitrectomy. SETTING: Shinjo Eye Clinic, Miyazaki, Japan. METHOD: One hundred thirty-six eyes had cataract extraction and implantation of a single-piece IOL using a frown incision, continuous annular anterior capsule tear, phacoemulsification, and intracapsular lens fixation. Thirty-six eyes also had vitrectomy. RESULTS: Mean postoperative refractive error was 0.55 diopter (D) +/- 1.34 (SD) in eyes having no vitrectomy and 0.04 +/- 1.24 D in those having vitrectomy. The difference between groups was statistically significant (P = .047; t-test). CONCLUSION: The refraction after simultaneous IOL implantation and vitrectomy shifted toward myopia by a mean of 0.50 D compared with that after IOL implantation alone.
Authors: Gökhan Gülkılık; Sevil Karaman Erdur; Merve Özbek; Mustafa Özsütçü; Mahmut Odabaşı; Göktuğ Demirci; Mehmet Selim Kocabora; Mustafa Eliaçık Journal: Turk J Ophthalmol Date: 2016-08-15