Literature DB >> 9367985

Rad53-dependent phosphorylation of Swi6 and down-regulation of CLN1 and CLN2 transcription occur in response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

J M Sidorova1, L L Breeden.   

Abstract

Budding yeast possesses a checkpoint-dependent mechanism of delaying G1 progression in response to UV and ionizing radiation DNA damage. We have shown that after a pulse of DNA damage in G1 with the alkylating agent MMS, there is also a MEC1-, RAD53-, and RAD9-dependent delay in G1. This delay occurs at or before Start, as the MMS-treated cells do not bud, remain sensitive to alpha-factor, and have low CLN1 and CLN2 transcript levels for a longer time than untreated cells. We further show that MMS directly and reversibly down-regulates CLN1 and CLN2 transcript levels. The initial drop in CLN transcript levels in MMS is not RAD53 dependent, but the kinetics of reaccumulation of CLN messages as cells recover from the damage is faster in rad53-11 cells than in wild type cells. This is not an indirect effect of faster progression through G1, because CLN transcripts reaccumulate faster in rad53-11 mutants arrested in G1 as well. In addition, the recovery of CLN mRNA levels can be also hastened by a SWI6 deletion or by overexpression of the truncated Swi4 (Swi4-t) that lacks the carboxy-terminal domain through which Swi4 associates with Swi6. This indicates that both Rad53 and Swi6 are negative regulators of CLN expression after DNA damage. Finally, Swi6 undergoes an MMS-inducible, RAD53-dependent phosphorylation in G1 cells, and Rad53, immunoprecipitated from MMS-treated cells, phosphorylates Swi6 in vitro. On the basis of these observations, we suggest that the Rad53-dependent phosphorylation of Swi6 may delay the transition to S phase by inhibiting CLN transcription.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9367985      PMCID: PMC316703          DOI: 10.1101/gad.11.22.3032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genes Dev        ISSN: 0890-9369            Impact factor:   11.361


  50 in total

1.  Cdc53 targets phosphorylated G1 cyclins for degradation by the ubiquitin proteolytic pathway.

Authors:  A R Willems; S Lanker; E E Patton; K L Craig; T F Nason; N Mathias; R Kobayashi; C Wittenberg; M Tyers
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-08-09       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function.

Authors:  G L Kiser; T A Weinert
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.138

Review 3.  At the heart of the budding yeast cell cycle.

Authors:  K Nasmyth
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 4.  How proteolysis drives the cell cycle.

Authors:  R W King; R J Deshaies; J M Peters; M W Kirschner
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  When checkpoints fail.

Authors:  A G Paulovich; D P Toczyski; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-02-07       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  A G Paulovich; R U Margulies; B M Garvik; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  RAD9 and DNA polymerase epsilon form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T A Navas; Y Sanchez; S J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-10-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 8.  Starting the cell cycle: what's the point?

Authors:  F R Cross
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 8.382

9.  Mutations in SPK1/RAD53 that specifically abolish checkpoint but not growth-related functions.

Authors:  D S Fay; Z Sun; D F Stern
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.886

10.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MEC1 gene, which encodes a homolog of the human ATM gene product, is required for G1 arrest following radiation treatment.

Authors:  W Siede; J B Allen; S J Elledge; E C Friedberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  68 in total

1.  Rdp1, a novel zinc finger protein, regulates the DNA damage response of rhp51(+) from Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Y S Shim; Y K Jang; M S Lim; J S Lee; R H Seong; S H Hong; S D Park
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Kyungjae Myung; Richard D Kolodner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  An essential role for the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DEAD-box helicase DHH1 in G1/S DNA-damage checkpoint recovery.

Authors:  Megan Bergkessel; Joseph C Reese
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Functional connection between the Clb5 cyclin, the protein kinase C pathway and the Swi4 transcription factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ethel Queralt; J Carlos Igual
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling.

Authors:  Ali Javaheri; Robert Wysocki; Olivier Jobin-Robitaille; Mohammed Altaf; Jacques Côté; Stephen J Kron
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The F-box protein Dia2 overcomes replication impedance to promote genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Deborah Blake; Brian Luke; Pamela Kanellis; Paul Jorgensen; Theo Goh; Sonya Penfold; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Daniel Durocher; Matthias Peter; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-04       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  The ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor Sml1 is a new target of the Mec1/Rad53 kinase cascade during growth and in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  X Zhao; A Chabes; V Domkin; L Thelander; R Rothstein
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-07-02       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Rad53 downregulates mitotic gene transcription by inhibiting the transcriptional activator Ndd1.

Authors:  Ellen R Edenberg; Ajay Vashisht; Jennifer A Benanti; James Wohlschlegel; David P Toczyski
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Evidence that Spt10 and Spt21 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae play distinct roles in vivo and functionally interact with MCB-binding factor, SCB-binding factor and Snf1.

Authors:  David Hess; Fred Winston
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-02       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Cell-cycle arrest and inhibition of G1 cyclin translation by iron in AFT1-1(up) yeast.

Authors:  C C Philpott; J Rashford; Y Yamaguchi-Iwai; T A Rouault; A Dancis; R D Klausner
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.