Literature DB >> 9365750

Longitudinal follow-up comparison of educational interventions: multimedia textbook, traditional lecture, and printed textbook.

D M D'Alessandro1, C D Kreiter, W E Erkonen, R J Winter, H R Knapp.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this prospective, interinstitutional study was to compare the long-term instructional effectiveness of a pediatric multimedia textbook (MMTB) to that of a standard lecture and a printed textbook.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized cohort of 89 3rd-year medical students from two institutions were initially evaluated from June 1992 to June 1993 and reevaluated in May 1994. Students were randomly assigned to one of four instructional groups: computer-aided instruction by means of MMTBs (n = 21), traditional lecture (n = 23), printed textbook (n = 19), and a control group (n = 26). After instruction, all groups were tested by means of a multiple choice test at the end of their pediatric clerkship; they were given this same test 11-22 months later.
RESULTS: The long-term instructional effectiveness of the MMTB, printed textbook, and lecture were the same as that in the control group, as determined by analysis of variance of mean test scores.
CONCLUSION: The educational advantage of MMTBs observed immediately after instruction was not detected 1 year later. Because attrition reduced statistical power, further research is necessary to determine how educational fading affects these instructional formats.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9365750     DOI: 10.1016/s1076-6332(97)80074-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  9 in total

1.  Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  T Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-06

Review 2.  The computer-based lecture.

Authors:  M M Wofford; A W Spickard; J L Wofford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  [HNORAD].

Authors:  M Grunewald; J Zenk; S Alibek; I Knickenberg; D Ketelsen; H Iro; W A Bautz; H Greess
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [Learning success of students in surgery with a multimedia-based manual. A prospective randomized trial].

Authors:  C Pape-Köhler; C Chmelik; M M Heiss; R Lefering
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Learning by Computer Simulation Does Not Lead to Better Test Performance on Advanced Cardiac Life Support Than Textbook Study.

Authors:  Jong Hoon Kim; Won Oak Kim; Kyeong Tae Min; Jong Yoon Yang; Yong Taek Nam
Journal:  J Educ Perioper Med       Date:  2002-01-01

6.  Teaching and Learning Medical Professionalism: an Input from Experienced Faculty and Young Graduates in a Tertiary Care Institute.

Authors:  Subrat Panda; Ananya DAS; Rituparna DAS; Wansalan Karu Shullai; Nalini Sharma; Anusuya Sarma
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

7.  Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter?

Authors:  Anderson Spickard; Nabil Alrajeh; David Cordray; Joseph Gigante
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Realist synthesis of educational interventions to improve nutrition care competencies and delivery by doctors and other healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Victor Mogre; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Fred Stevens; Paul Aryee; Mary Gemma Cherry; Tim Dornan
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Pedagogical Approaches to Diagnostic Imaging Education: A Narrative Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Kathleen L Linaker
Journal:  J Chiropr Humanit       Date:  2015-11-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.