Literature DB >> 12133144

Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter?

Anderson Spickard1, Nabil Alrajeh, David Cordray, Joseph Gigante.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of an online lecture versus a live lecture on screening given to medical students who are participating in an outpatient clerkship.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study. PARTICIPANTS AND
SETTING: Ninety-five senior medical students in a primary care medicine clerkship based at university and distant clinic sites. INTERVENTION AND MEASUREMENTS: Forty-eight medical students were randomized to the live lecture on screening (live lecture group), and forty-seven medical students were randomized to the online lecture on screening (online lecture group). Outcome measures included students' knowledge, use of time, and satisfaction with the lecture experience.
RESULTS: Compared to students in the live lecture group, students in the online lecture group demonstrated equal post-intervention knowledge of screening (P =.91) and expended 50 minutes less time to complete the lecture. Online lecture students who used the audio feed of the lecture were equally satisfied with the lecture as the live lecture students. Without the audio feed, online lecture students were less satisfied.
CONCLUSIONS: An online lecture on screening is a feasible, efficient, and effective method to teach students on outpatient clerkships about principles of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12133144      PMCID: PMC1495076          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10731.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  17 in total

1.  Acquisition of surgical skills: a randomized trial of didactic, videotape, and computer-based training.

Authors:  A N Summers; G C Rinehart; D Simpson; P N Redlich
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Utilization of a pediatric emergency department education computer.

Authors:  M Pusic; K Johnson; A Duggan
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2001-02

3.  Effects of traditional classroom and distance continuing education: a theory-driven evaluation of a vaccine-preventable diseases course.

Authors:  K E Umble; R M Cervero; B Yang; W L Atkinson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Evaluation of a Web-based introductory psychology course: I. Learning and satisfaction in on-line versus lecture courses.

Authors:  R H Maki; W S Maki; M Patterson; P D Whittaker
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2000-05

Review 5.  The computer-based lecture.

Authors:  M M Wofford; A W Spickard; J L Wofford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Dangers in the evaluation of instructional media.

Authors:  R E Clark
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 6.893

7.  The inadequacy of recent research on computer-assisted instruction.

Authors:  D R Keane; G R Norman; J Vickers
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Preserving quality as the site of medical education shifts.

Authors:  J P Kassirer
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Computer-assisted learning compared with weekly seminars for teaching fundamental electrocardiography to junior medical students.

Authors:  R E Fincher; A M Abdulla; M R Sridharan; J L Houghton; J S Henke
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Comparison of computer-assisted instruction and seminar instruction to acquire psychomotor and cognitive knowledge of epistaxis management.

Authors:  M M Carr; R K Reznick; D H Brown
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.497

View more
  16 in total

1.  Online instruction: time to grow.

Authors:  Stephen D Sisson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning.

Authors:  David A Cook; Denise M Dupras
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Online vs live methods for teaching difficult airway management to anesthesiology residents.

Authors:  Giuseppe Bello; Mariano Alberto Pennisi; Riccardo Maviglia; Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore; Maria Grazia Bocci; Luca Montini; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  How students and faculty interact with a searchable online database of the medical curriculum.

Authors:  Firas H Wehbe; Anderson Spickard
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

5.  Adapting web-based instruction to residents' knowledge improves learning efficiency: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  David A Cook; Thomas J Beckman; Kris G Thomas; Warren G Thompson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  This is Not Your Grandfather's Medical School: Novel Tools to Enhance Medical Education.

Authors:  Ryan Sheehy
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct

7.  The effectiveness of streaming video on medical student learning: a case study.

Authors:  Patrick D Bridge; Matt Jackson; Leah Robinson
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2009-08-19

8.  Podcasts as a teaching tool in orthopaedic surgery : Is it beneficial or more an exemption card from attending lectures?

Authors:  Tobias Schöbel; Dirk Zajonz; Peter Melcher; Johannes Lange; Benjamin Fischer; Christoph-E Heyde; Andreas Roth; Mohamed Ghanem
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Implementing Rubric-Based Peer Review for Video Microlecture Design in Health Professions Education.

Authors:  Yerko Berrocal; Jenna Regan; Jonathan Fisher; Andrew Darr; Leslie Hammersmith; Meenakshy Aiyer
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2021-10-18

10.  An analysis of lecture video utilization in undergraduate medical education: associations with performance in the courses.

Authors:  John A McNulty; Amy Hoyt; Gregory Gruener; Arcot Chandrasekhar; Baltazar Espiritu; Ron Price; Ross Naheedy
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.