Literature DB >> 31309357

A Capabilities Approach to Prenatal Screening for Fetal Abnormalities.

Greg Stapleton1, Wybo Dondorp2, Peter Schröder-Bäck3, Guido de Wert2.   

Abstract

International guidelines recommend that prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities should only be offered within a non-directive framework aimed at enabling women in making meaningful reproductive choices. Whilst this position is widely endorsed, developments in cell-free fetal DNA based Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing are now raising questions about its continued suitability for guiding screening policy and practice. This issue is most apparent within debates on the scope of the screening offer. Implied by the aim of enabling meaningful reproductive choices is the idea that screening services should support women in accessing prenatal tests that best enable them to realize the types of reproductive choice that they find important. However, beyond whatever options meet the quality standards required for facilitating an informed decision, the remaining criteria of facilitating autonomous choice is strictly non-directive. As a result, policy makers receive little indication prior to consultation with each individual woman, about what conditions should be prioritized during the offer of screening. In this paper we try to address this issue by using the capabilities approach to further specify the non-directive aim of enabling meaningful reproductive choice. The resulting framework is then used to assess the relative importance of offering prenatal screening where concerning different types of genetic condition. We conclude that greater priority may be ascribed to offering prenatal screening for conditions that more significantly diminish a woman's central capabilities. It follows that serious congenital and earlier-onset conditions are more likely to fulfill these criteria.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abortion; Capabilities approach; Ethics; Justice; Prenatal screening; Reproductive autonomy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31309357     DOI: 10.1007/s10728-019-00379-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Care Anal        ISSN: 1065-3058


  19 in total

1.  Abortion and human rights.

Authors:  Norman C Gillespie
Journal:  Ethics       Date:  1977-04

2.  Response to: the human embryo in the Christian tradition.

Authors:  R Gill
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years.

Authors:  Anne Andermann; Ingeborg Blancquaert; Sylvie Beauchamp; Véronique Déry
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Modern Pregnancies and (Im)Perfect Babies.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kraft
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 5.  Noninvasive Prenatal DNA Testing: The Vanguard of Genomic Medicine.

Authors:  Lisa Hui; Diana W Bianchi
Journal:  Annu Rev Med       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 13.739

6.  Reconciling ethical and economic conceptions of value in health policy using the capabilities approach: A qualitative investigation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing.

Authors:  Mia Kibel; Meredith Vanstone
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  The moral status of preembryos, embryos, fetuses, and infants.

Authors:  C Strong
Journal:  J Med Philos       Date:  1997-10

8.  Prenatal screening: an ethical agenda for the near future.

Authors:  Antina de Jong; Guido M W R de Wert
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.898

9.  Quality of life among parents of children with congenital heart disease, parents of children with other diseases and parents of healthy children.

Authors:  S Lawoko; J J F Soares
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.

Authors:  Wybo Dondorp; Guido de Wert; Yvonne Bombard; Diana W Bianchi; Carsten Bergmann; Pascal Borry; Lyn S Chitty; Florence Fellmann; Francesca Forzano; Alison Hall; Lidewij Henneman; Heidi C Howard; Anneke Lucassen; Kelly Ormond; Borut Peterlin; Dragica Radojkovic; Wolf Rogowski; Maria Soller; Aad Tibben; Lisbeth Tranebjærg; Carla G van El; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.