OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether there are systematic differences between the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) for state cigarette smoking prevalence estimates. METHODS: BRFSS telephone survey estimates were compared with estimates from the US Census CPS tobacco-use supplements (the CPS sample frame includes persons in households without telephones). Weighted overall and sex- and race-specific BRFSS and CPS state estimates of adults smoking were analyzed for 1985, 1989, and 1992/1993. RESULTS: Overall estimates of smoking prevalence from the BRFSS were slightly lower than estimates from CPS (median difference: -2.0 percentage points in 1985, -0.7 in 1989, and -1.9 in 1992/1993; P < .05 for all comparisons), but there was variation among states. Differences between BRFSS and CPS estimates were larger among men than among women and larger among Blacks than among Hispanics or Whites; for most states, these differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The BRFSS generally provides state estimates of smoking prevalence similar to those obtained from CPS, and these are appropriate for ongoing state surveillance of smoking prevalence.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether there are systematic differences between the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the Current Population Survey (CPS) for state cigarette smoking prevalence estimates. METHODS: BRFSS telephone survey estimates were compared with estimates from the US Census CPStobacco-use supplements (the CPS sample frame includes persons in households without telephones). Weighted overall and sex- and race-specific BRFSS and CPS state estimates of adults smoking were analyzed for 1985, 1989, and 1992/1993. RESULTS: Overall estimates of smoking prevalence from the BRFSS were slightly lower than estimates from CPS (median difference: -2.0 percentage points in 1985, -0.7 in 1989, and -1.9 in 1992/1993; P < .05 for all comparisons), but there was variation among states. Differences between BRFSS and CPS estimates were larger among men than among women and larger among Blacks than among Hispanics or Whites; for most states, these differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: The BRFSS generally provides state estimates of smoking prevalence similar to those obtained from CPS, and these are appropriate for ongoing state surveillance of smoking prevalence.
Authors: P L Remington; M Y Smith; D F Williamson; R F Anda; E M Gentry; G C Hogelin Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 1988 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: E M Gentry; W D Kalsbeek; G C Hogelin; J T Jones; K L Gaines; M R Forman; J S Marks; F L Trowbridge Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 1985 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: W S C Poston; C K Haddock; J Spertus; D M Catanese; V N Pavlik; D J Hyman; C L Hanis; J P Forevt Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Fatma Shebl; Carolyn E Poppell; Min Zhan; Diane M Dwyer; Annette B Hopkins; Carmela Groves; Faye Reed; C Devadason; Eileen K Steinberger Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2009 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Benjamin G Druss; Liping Zhao; Silke A von Esenwein; Joseph R Bona; Larry Fricks; Sherry Jenkins-Tucker; Evelina Sterling; Ralph Diclemente; Kate Lorig Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2010-02-25 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Mohammad Siahpush; Paraskevi A Farazi; Shannon I Maloney; Danae Dinkel; Minh N Nguyen; Gopal K Singh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-06-15 Impact factor: 2.692