Literature DB >> 6638234

Personal versus telephone surveys for collecting household health data at the local level.

M F Weeks, R A Kulka, J T Lessler, R W Whitmore.   

Abstract

Personal and telephone interview surveys were conducted simultaneously during 1981 in the same area (four counties in the area of Tampa Bay, Florida) and utilizing the same interview schedule. Following completion of the surveys, validity checks were made with the medical providers reported by a subsample of respondents to each mode. The telephone survey yielded a lower response rate but cost less than half the personal interview. There was some evidence of nonresponse bias in the telephone survey, and some relatively minor differences in responses were found between the two modes, but there was no conclusive evidence that the response differences resulted from mode effects. Telephone respondents appeared to be somewhat more accurate in their reporting of visits to medical providers, although accuracy comparisons must be interpreted with caution in view of the disparate success experienced for the two modes in securing permission forms for the release of medical record information.

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6638234      PMCID: PMC1651264          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.73.12.1389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  6 in total

1.  Medical economics survey-methods study: cost-effectiveness of alternative survey strategies.

Authors:  R Yaffe; S Shapiro; R R Fuchseberg; C A Rohde; H C Corpeno
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Changes in morbidity, disability, and utilization differentials between the poor and the nonpoor: data from the health interview survey: 1964 and 1973.

Authors:  R W Wilson; E L White
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Telephone versus in-person surveys of community health status.

Authors:  C S Aneshensel; R R Frerichs; V A Clark; P A Yokopenic
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys.

Authors:  J Siemiatycki
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Potentials of local health surveys: a state-of-the-art summary.

Authors:  L A Aday; C Sellers; R M Andersen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Measuring depression in the community: a comparison of telephone and personal interviews.

Authors:  C S Aneshensel; R R Frerichs; V A Clark; P A Yokopenic
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  1982
  6 in total
  29 in total

1.  Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results.

Authors:  M R Douglas; S Mallonee; G R Istre
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based intervention using random-digit-dial recruitment: the Disaster Recovery Web project.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ruggiero; Heidi S Resnick; Lisa A Paul; Kirstin Gros; Jenna L McCauley; Ron Acierno; Mark Morgan; Sandro Galea
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  Response comparability of family and staff proxies for nursing home residents.

Authors:  S L Tennstedt; K M Skinner; L M Sullivan; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Issues in conducting epidemiologic research among elders: lessons from the MOBILIZE Boston Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Jennifer L Kelsey; Douglas P Kiel; Anthony M Roman; L Adrienne Cupples; Marcie B Freeman; Richard N Jones; Marian T Hannan; Suzanne G Leveille; Margaret M Gagnon; Lewis A Lipsitz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  Psychopathology in bariatric surgery candidates: a review of studies using structured diagnostic interviews.

Authors:  Sarah Malik; James E Mitchell; Scott Engel; Ross Crosby; Steve Wonderlich
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.735

6.  Measuring health behaviors and landline telephones: potential coverage bias in a low-income, rural population.

Authors:  Fatma Shebl; Carolyn E Poppell; Min Zhan; Diane M Dwyer; Annette B Hopkins; Carmela Groves; Faye Reed; C Devadason; Eileen K Steinberger
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  Telephone coverage and measurement of health risk indicators: data from the National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  J E Anderson; D E Nelson; R W Wilson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Sampling procedures and sample representativeness in a national telephone survey: a Portuguese example.

Authors:  Sofia Correia; Paulo Dinis; Francisco Rolo; Nuno Lunet
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 3.380

9.  A comparison of diagnoses obtained from in-person and telephone interviews, using the semi-structured assessment for the genetics of alcoholism (SSAGA).

Authors:  John R Kramer; Grace Chan; Samuel Kuperman; Kathleen K Bucholz; Howard J Edenberg; Marc A Schuckit; Linnea A Polgreen; Ellen S Kapp; Victor M Hesselbrock; John I Nurnberger; Laura J Bierut
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.582

10.  Dietary cardiovascular risk factors and serum cholesterol in an Old Order Mennonite community.

Authors:  M Glick; A C Michel; J Dorn; M Horwitz; T Rosenthal; M Trevisan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.