Literature DB >> 9357346

Are the best coronary artery bypass surgeons identified by physician surveys?

A J Hartz1, J S Pulido, E M Kuhn.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the validity of surveys for identifying the best coronary artery bypass surgeons.
METHODS: Data on physicians who performed coronary artery bypass surgery were available from New York, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. Data on physicians' reputation were obtained from one national and five city surveys. The measure of surgical performance was the mortality ratio (MR), that is, the ratio of the observed to the predicted patient mortality rate.
RESULTS: Mortality ratios were very similar for the 10,722 patients treated by the 31 surgeons defined as "best" doctors in the surveys (MR = 98) and for the 74,854 patients treated by 243 other surgeons who had more than a minimal number of cases (MR = .96). The mortality ratio was 1.34 for the patients treated by surgeons with the lowest volumes and .87 for the surgeons who performed more than 400 coronary artery bypass surgeries in 3 years.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the quality of a coronary artery bypass surgeon may be more closely associated with patient volume than with the surgeon's reputation among peers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9357346      PMCID: PMC1381127          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.87.10.1645

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  14 in total

1.  Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Scheduled vs nonscheduled operations.

Authors:  J A Showstack; K E Rosenfeld; D W Garnick; H S Luft; R W Schaffarzick; J Fowles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-02-13       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparing hospitals that perform coronary artery bypass surgery: the effect of outcome measures and data sources.

Authors:  A J Hartz; E M Kuhn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  New York State's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System: four years later.

Authors:  E L Hannan; D Kumar; M Racz; A L Siu; M R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  The relation between surgical volume and mortality: an exploration of causal factors and alternative models.

Authors:  H S Luft
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality.

Authors:  H S Luft; J P Bunker; A C Enthoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1979-12-20       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  The volume-outcome relationship: practice-makes-perfect or selective-referral patterns?

Authors:  H S Luft; S S Hunt; S C Maerki
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Judging hospitals by severity-adjusted mortality rates: the case of CABG surgery.

Authors:  B Landon; L I Iezzoni; A S Ash; M Shwartz; J Daley; J S Hughes; Y D Mackiernan
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.730

8.  Does practice make perfect? Part I: The relation between hospital volume and outcomes for selected diagnostic categories.

Authors:  A B Flood; W R Scott; W Ewy
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Coronary artery bypass surgery: the relationship between inhospital mortality rate and surgical volume after controlling for clinical risk factors.

Authors:  E L Hannan; H Kilburn; H Bernard; J F O'Donnell; G Lukacik; E P Shields
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Improving the outcomes of coronary artery bypass surgery in New York State.

Authors:  E L Hannan; H Kilburn; M Racz; E Shields; M R Chassin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  3 in total

1.  How do elderly patients decide where to go for major surgery? Telephone interview survey.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-28

2.  How Referring Providers Choose Specialists for Their Patients: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Caitlin B Finn; Jason K Tong; Hannah E Alexander; Chris Wirtalla; Heather Wachtel; Carmen E Guerra; Shivan J Mehta; Richard Wender; Rachel R Kelz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.473

3.  Physicians' attitudes towards the media and peer-review selection of the 'best cancer doctor': comparison of two different selection methods.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Juhee Cho; Hyung Kook Yang; So Young Kim; Soohyeon Lee; Eun Joo Nam; Joo Seop Chung; Jeong-Soo Im; Keeho Park; Jong Hyock Park
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 2.692

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.