Literature DB >> 7979781

New York State's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System: four years later.

E L Hannan1, D Kumar, M Racz, A L Siu, M R Chassin.   

Abstract

This study examined changes in the risk-adjusted mortality associated with coronary artery bypass grafting procedures performed in New York State during the first 4 years of New York's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System (1989 to 1992). To track performance over time, surgeons and hospitals were subdivided into three groups on the basis of their performance in 1989. The risk-adjusted mortality for each of the three groups was computed for 1992 and compared with their 1989 mortality. The results indicate that all groups of providers exhibited large reductions in the risk-adjusted mortalities, with the groups that showed the highest initial mortalities manifesting the most improvement. However, the group rankings remained the same in 1992 as they were in 1989. For example, when the hospital groups were based on the terciles of risk-adjusted mortality observed in 1989, the risk-adjusted mortality decreased from 2.72% to 2.19% for group 1, from 4.24% to 2.51% for group 2, and from 7.12% to 2.77% for group 3. Notably, the risk-adjusted mortalities of the three groups were all significantly different from one another in 1989, but were not significantly different from one another in 1992. Another interesting finding was that the volume of operations performed by the various provider groups did not change substantially in the 4-year period.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7979781     DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)91726-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  25 in total

1.  Do quality report cards play a role in HMOs' contracting practices? Evidence from New York State.

Authors:  D B Mukamel; A I Mushlin; D Weimer; J Zwanziger; T Parker; I Indridason
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  The legacy of Bristol: public disclosure of individual surgeons' results.

Authors:  Bruce Keogh; David Spiegelhalter; Alan Bailey; James Roxburgh; Patrick Magee; Colin Hilton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-08-21

3.  Reducing avoidable deaths among veterans: directing private-sector surgical care to high-performance hospitals.

Authors:  William B Weeks; Alan N West; Amy E Wallace; Richard E Lee; David C Goodman; Justin B Dimick; James P Bagian
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Know thy surgeon: the importance of surgeon-specific information.

Authors:  J F Piccirillo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Improving the quality of health care: what strategy works?

Authors:  M R Chassin
Journal:  Bull N Y Acad Med       Date:  1996

6.  Patients' Awareness, Usage and Impact of Hospital Report Cards in the US.

Authors:  Martin Emmert; Mark Schlesinger
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  An audit and feedback system for effective quality improvement in head and neck surgery: Can we become better surgeons?

Authors:  Carol M Lewis; Marcus M Monroe; Dianna B Roberts; Amy C Hessel; Stephen Y Lai; Randal S Weber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The need for accurate risk-adjusted measures of outcome in surgery. Lessons learned through coronary artery bypass.

Authors:  B P Griffith; B G Hattler; R L Hardesty; R L Kormos; S M Pham; H T Bahnson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Risks and results of surgery.

Authors:  S N Bolsin; A M Black; A J Bryan; C J Day
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1995-12

10.  Public Reporting of Mortality Rates for Hospitalized Medicare Patients and Trends in Mortality for Reported Conditions.

Authors:  Karen E Joynt; E John Orav; Jie Zheng; Ashish K Jha
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.