Caitlin B Finn1,2,3,4, Jason K Tong5,6,7, Hannah E Alexander5, Chris Wirtalla5, Heather Wachtel7, Carmen E Guerra6,8, Shivan J Mehta6,8, Richard Wender6,9, Rachel R Kelz5,6,7. 1. NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA. Caitlin.Finn@pennmedicine.upenn.edu. 2. Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Caitlin.Finn@pennmedicine.upenn.edu. 3. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Caitlin.Finn@pennmedicine.upenn.edu. 4. Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Caitlin.Finn@pennmedicine.upenn.edu. 5. Center for Surgery and Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 6. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 7. Department of Surgery, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 8. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 9. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physician referrals are a critical step in directing patients to high-quality specialists. Despite efforts to encourage referrals to high-volume hospitals, many patients receive treatment at low-volume centers with worse outcomes. We aimed to determine the most important factors considered by referring providers when selecting specialists for their patients through a systematic review of medical and surgical literature. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched from January 2000 to July 2021 using terms related to referrals, specialty, surgery, primary care, and decision-making. We included survey and interview studies reporting the factors considered by healthcare providers as they refer patients to specialists in the USA. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers. Quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist. A qualitative thematic analysis was performed to synthesize common decision factors across studies. RESULTS: We screened 1,972 abstracts and identified 7 studies for inclusion, reporting on 1,575 providers. Thematic analysis showed that referring providers consider factors related to the specialist's clinical expertise (skill, training, outcomes, and assessments), interactions between the patient and specialist (prior experience, rapport, location, scheduling, preference, and insurance), and interactions between the referring physician and specialist (personal relationships, communication, reputation, reciprocity, and practice or system affiliation). Notably, studies did not describe how providers assess clinical or technical skills. CONCLUSIONS: Referring providers rely on subjective factors and assessments to evaluate quality when selecting a specialist. There may be a role for guidelines and objective measures of quality to inform the choice of specialist by referring providers.
BACKGROUND: Physician referrals are a critical step in directing patients to high-quality specialists. Despite efforts to encourage referrals to high-volume hospitals, many patients receive treatment at low-volume centers with worse outcomes. We aimed to determine the most important factors considered by referring providers when selecting specialists for their patients through a systematic review of medical and surgical literature. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched from January 2000 to July 2021 using terms related to referrals, specialty, surgery, primary care, and decision-making. We included survey and interview studies reporting the factors considered by healthcare providers as they refer patients to specialists in the USA. Studies were screened by two independent reviewers. Quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist. A qualitative thematic analysis was performed to synthesize common decision factors across studies. RESULTS: We screened 1,972 abstracts and identified 7 studies for inclusion, reporting on 1,575 providers. Thematic analysis showed that referring providers consider factors related to the specialist's clinical expertise (skill, training, outcomes, and assessments), interactions between the patient and specialist (prior experience, rapport, location, scheduling, preference, and insurance), and interactions between the referring physician and specialist (personal relationships, communication, reputation, reciprocity, and practice or system affiliation). Notably, studies did not describe how providers assess clinical or technical skills. CONCLUSIONS: Referring providers rely on subjective factors and assessments to evaluate quality when selecting a specialist. There may be a role for guidelines and objective measures of quality to inform the choice of specialist by referring providers.
Authors: Neal S Kleiman; Frederick G P Welt; Alexander G Truesdell; Matthew Sherwood; Sabeeda Kadavath; Pinak B Shah; Lloyd W Klein; Shea Hogan; Clifford Kavinsky; Tanveer Rab Journal: JACC Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2021-01-11 Impact factor: 11.195
Authors: Azeem T Malik; Nikhil Jain; Thomas J Scharschmidt; Mengnai Li; Andrew H Glassman; Safdar N Khan Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2018-05-31 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Linda W Xu; Amy Li; Christian Swinney; Maya Babu; Anand Veeravagu; Stacey Quintero Wolfe; Brian V Nahed; John K Ratliff Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2016-09-23