BACKGROUND: It was the aim of this study to assess the long-term effects of physical exercise and low-fat diet on the progression of coronary artery disease. At the beginning of the study, 113 male patients with coronary artery disease were randomized to an intervention group (n=56) or a control group (n=57); 90 patients (80%) could be reevaluated after 6 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients in the intervention group (n=40) showed a reduction in total serum cholesterol (6.03+/-1.03 versus 5.67+/-1.01 mmol/L; P<.03) and triglyceride levels (1.94+/-0.8 versus 1.6+/-0.89 mmol/L; P<.005) and maintained their initial body mass index (26+/-2 versus 27+/-2 kg/m2; P=NS), but results were not statistically different from the control group (n=50) (total serum cholesterol, 6.05+/-1.02 versus 5.79+/-0.88 mmol/L; triglycerides, 2.25+/-1.28 versus 1.85+/-0.96 mmol/L [both P=NS]; body mass index, 26+/-2 versus 28+/-3 kg/m2 [P<.0001]). In the intervention group, there was a significant 28% increase in physical work capacity (166+/-59 versus 212+/-89 W; P<.001), whereas values remained essentially unchanged in the control group (165+/-51 versus 170+/-60 W; P=NS; between groups, P<.05). In the intervention group, coronary stenoses progressed at a significantly slower rate than in the control group (P<.0001). Energy expenditure during exercise was assessed in a subgroup; patients with regression of coronary stenoses spent an average of 1784+/-384 kcal/wk (approximately 4 hours of moderate aerobic exercise per week). Multivariate regression analysis identified only physical work capacity as independently contributing to angiographic changes. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 years of multifactorial risk intervention, there is significant and persistent improvement in lipoprotein levels and physical work capacity, which results in a significant retardation of disease progression. These beneficial effects appear to be largely due to chronic physical exercise.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: It was the aim of this study to assess the long-term effects of physical exercise and low-fat diet on the progression of coronary artery disease. At the beginning of the study, 113 male patients with coronary artery disease were randomized to an intervention group (n=56) or a control group (n=57); 90 patients (80%) could be reevaluated after 6 years. METHODS AND RESULTS:Patients in the intervention group (n=40) showed a reduction in total serum cholesterol (6.03+/-1.03 versus 5.67+/-1.01 mmol/L; P<.03) and triglyceride levels (1.94+/-0.8 versus 1.6+/-0.89 mmol/L; P<.005) and maintained their initial body mass index (26+/-2 versus 27+/-2 kg/m2; P=NS), but results were not statistically different from the control group (n=50) (total serum cholesterol, 6.05+/-1.02 versus 5.79+/-0.88 mmol/L; triglycerides, 2.25+/-1.28 versus 1.85+/-0.96 mmol/L [both P=NS]; body mass index, 26+/-2 versus 28+/-3 kg/m2 [P<.0001]). In the intervention group, there was a significant 28% increase in physical work capacity (166+/-59 versus 212+/-89 W; P<.001), whereas values remained essentially unchanged in the control group (165+/-51 versus 170+/-60 W; P=NS; between groups, P<.05). In the intervention group, coronary stenoses progressed at a significantly slower rate than in the control group (P<.0001). Energy expenditure during exercise was assessed in a subgroup; patients with regression of coronary stenoses spent an average of 1784+/-384 kcal/wk (approximately 4 hours of moderate aerobic exercise per week). Multivariate regression analysis identified only physical work capacity as independently contributing to angiographic changes. CONCLUSIONS: After 6 years of multifactorial risk intervention, there is significant and persistent improvement in lipoprotein levels and physical work capacity, which results in a significant retardation of disease progression. These beneficial effects appear to be largely due to chronic physical exercise.
Authors: Anne B Newman; John A Dodson; Timothy S Church; Thomas W Buford; Roger A Fielding; Stephen Kritchevsky; Daniel Beavers; Marco Pahor; Randall S Stafford; Anita D Szady; Walter T Ambrosius; Mary M McDermott Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Arturo A Arce-Esquivel; Kurt V Kreutzer; James W E Rush; James R Turk; M Harold Laughlin Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Tasnim F Imran; Yash Patel; R Curtis Ellison; J Jeffrey Carr; Donna K Arnett; James S Pankow; Gerardo Heiss; Steven C Hunt; J Michael Gaziano; Luc Djoussé Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2016-04-21 Impact factor: 8.311