Tasnim F Imran1, Yash Patel2, R Curtis Ellison2, J Jeffrey Carr2, Donna K Arnett2, James S Pankow2, Gerardo Heiss2, Steven C Hunt2, J Michael Gaziano2, Luc Djoussé2. 1. From the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (T.F.I., Y.P., J.M.G., L.D.); Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, MA (R.C.E.); Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN (J.J.C.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (D.K.A.); Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (J.S.P.); Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (G.H.); and Cardiovascular Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (S.C.H.). TFImran@partners.org. 2. From the Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (T.F.I., Y.P., J.M.G., L.D.); Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Boston University School of Medicine, MA (R.C.E.); Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN (J.J.C.); Department of Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham (D.K.A.); Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (J.S.P.); Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (G.H.); and Cardiovascular Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City (S.C.H.).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Studies have reported mixed findings on the association between physical activity and subclinical atherosclerosis. We sought to examine whether walking is associated with prevalent coronary artery calcification (CAC) and aortic calcification. APPROACH AND RESULTS: In a cross-sectional design, we studied 2971 participants of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study without a history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A standardized questionnaire was used to ascertain the number of blocks walked daily to compute walking metabolic equivalent hours. CAC was measured by cardiac computed tomography. We defined prevalent CAC and aortic calcification using an Agatston score of at least 100 and used generalized estimating equations to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios. Mean age was 55 years, and 60% of participants were women. Compared with the ≤3.75-Met-h/wk group, prevalence ratios for CAC after adjusting for age, sex, race, smoking, alcohol use, total physical activity (excluding walking), and familial clustering were 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.79) for >3.75 to 7.5 Met-h/wk, 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.99) for >7.5 to 15 Met-h/wk, and 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.81) for >15 to 22.5 Met-h/wk, (P trend=0.01). The walking-CAC relationship remained significant for those with body mass index ≥25 (P trend=0.02) and persisted with CAC cutoffs of 300, 200, 150, and 50 but not 0. When examined as a continuous variable, a J-shaped association between walking and CAC was found. The walking-aortic calcification association was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that walking is associated with lower prevalent CAC (but not aortic calcification) in adults without known heart disease.
OBJECTIVE: Studies have reported mixed findings on the association between physical activity and subclinical atherosclerosis. We sought to examine whether walking is associated with prevalent coronary artery calcification (CAC) and aortic calcification. APPROACH AND RESULTS: In a cross-sectional design, we studied 2971 participants of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study without a history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass grafting, or percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. A standardized questionnaire was used to ascertain the number of blocks walked daily to compute walking metabolic equivalent hours. CAC was measured by cardiac computed tomography. We defined prevalent CAC and aortic calcification using an Agatston score of at least 100 and used generalized estimating equations to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios. Mean age was 55 years, and 60% of participants were women. Compared with the ≤3.75-Met-h/wk group, prevalence ratios for CAC after adjusting for age, sex, race, smoking, alcohol use, total physical activity (excluding walking), and familial clustering were 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.79) for >3.75 to 7.5 Met-h/wk, 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.99) for >7.5 to 15 Met-h/wk, and 0.54 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.81) for >15 to 22.5 Met-h/wk, (P trend=0.01). The walking-CAC relationship remained significant for those with body mass index ≥25 (P trend=0.02) and persisted with CAC cutoffs of 300, 200, 150, and 50 but not 0. When examined as a continuous variable, a J-shaped association between walking and CAC was found. The walking-aortic calcification association was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that walking is associated with lower prevalent CAC (but not aortic calcification) in adults without known heart disease.
Authors: Paul D Thompson; David Buchner; Ileana L Pina; Gary J Balady; Mark A Williams; Bess H Marcus; Kathy Berra; Steven N Blair; Fernando Costa; Barry Franklin; Gerald F Fletcher; Neil F Gordon; Russell R Pate; Beatriz L Rodriguez; Antronette K Yancey; Nanette K Wenger Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-06-24 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Allen J Taylor; Tammy Watkins; Debbie Bell; Jon Carrow; Jody Bindeman; Diane Scherr; Irwin Feuerstein; Henry Wong; Saroj Bhattarai; Mark Vaitkus; Patrick G O'Malley Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: G Schuler; R Hambrecht; G Schlierf; J Niebauer; K Hauer; J Neumann; E Hoberg; A Drinkmann; F Bacher; M Grunze Journal: Circulation Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P D Wood; M L Stefanick; D M Dreon; B Frey-Hewitt; S C Garay; P T Williams; H R Superko; S P Fortmann; J J Albers; K M Vranizan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1988-11-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christopher J O'Donnell; Irmarie Chazaro; Peter W F Wilson; Caroline Fox; Marian T Hannan; Douglas P Kiel; L Adrienne Cupples Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-07-16 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: D Ornish; S E Brown; L W Scherwitz; J H Billings; W T Armstrong; T A Ports; S M McLanahan; R L Kirkeeide; R J Brand; K L Gould Journal: Lancet Date: 1990-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Terence M Doherty; Lorraine A Fitzpatrick; Daisuke Inoue; Jian-Hua Qiao; Michael C Fishbein; Robert C Detrano; Prediman K Shah; Tripathi B Rajavashisth Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Daisuke Kamimura; Loretta R Cain-Shields; Donald Clark; Adebamike A Oshunbade; Kellan E Ashley; Cameron S Guild; Paul D Loprinzi; Robert Newton; Michael J Blaha; Takeki Suzuki; Javed Butler; John E Hall; Adolfo Correa; Michael E Hall Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2021-03-10 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Lidia Capotosto; Francesco Massoni; Simone De Sio; Serafino Ricci; Antonio Vitarelli Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Vincent L Aengevaeren; Arend Mosterd; Sanjay Sharma; Niek H J Prakken; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Paul D Thompson; Birgitta K Velthuis; Thijs M H Eijsvogels Journal: Circulation Date: 2020-04-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ruben De Bosscher; Christophe Dausin; Piet Claus; Jan Bogaert; Steven Dymarkowski; Kaatje Goetschalckx; Olivier Ghekiere; Ann Belmans; Caroline M Van De Heyning; Paul Van Herck; Bernard Paelinck; Haroun El Addouli; André La Gerche; Lieven Herbots; Hein Heidbuchel; Rik Willems; Guido Claessen Journal: BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Date: 2021-04-16
Authors: Abdulaziz Malik; Jaya S Kanduri; Abdul Aziz A Asbeutah; Haitham Khraishah; Changyu Shen; Francine K Welty Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-03-26 Impact factor: 5.501