Literature DB >> 16971975

Universal access: but when? Treating the right patient at the right time: access to cardiac rehabilitation.

William Dafoe1, Heather Arthur, Helen Stokes, Louise Morrin, Louise Beaton.   

Abstract

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society formed an Access to Care Working Group ('Working Group') in the spring of 2004. The mandate of the group was to use the best science and information to establish reasonable triage categories and safe wait times for access to common cardiovascular services and procedures. The present commentary presents the rationale for benchmarks for cardiac rehabilitation (CR) services. The Working Group's search for evidence included: a full literature review of the efficacy of CR, and the factors affecting access and referral to CR; a review of existing guidelines for access to CR; and a national survey of 14 CR programs across Canada undertaken in May 2005 to solicit information on referral to, and wait times for, CR. The Working Group also reviewed the results of The Ontario Cardiac Rehabilitation Pilot Project (2002) undertaken by the Cardiac Care Network of Ontario, which reported the average and median wait times for CR. Some international agencies have formulated their own guidelines relating to the optimal wait time for the onset of CR. However, due to the limited amount of supporting literature, these guidelines have generally been formed as consensus statements. The Canadian national survey showed that few programs had guidelines for individual programs. The Cardiac Care Network of Ontario pilot project reported that the average and median times from a cardiac event to the intake into CR were 99 and 70 days, respectively. The national survey of sampled CR programs also revealed quite remarkable differences across programs in terms of the length of time between first contact to first attendance and to commencement of exercise. Programs that required a stress test before program initiation had the longest wait for exercise initiation. Some patients need to be seen within a very short time frame to prevent a marked deterioration in their medical or psychological state. In some cases, early intervention and advocacy may reduce the risk of loss of employment. Or, there may be profound disturbances in the patient's family as a result of the cardiac event. For other patient groups, preferable wait times vary from one to 30 days, and acceptable wait times vary from seven to 60 days. All cardiovascular disease patients require core aspects of CR services. Patients who would derive benefit from formal CR programs should be provided the opportunity, given the proven efficacy and cost effectiveness of CR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16971975      PMCID: PMC2570237          DOI: 10.1016/s0828-282x(06)70309-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Cardiol        ISSN: 0828-282X            Impact factor:   5.223


  35 in total

1.  An overview of randomized trials of rehabilitation with exercise after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  G T O'Connor; J E Buring; S Yusuf; S Z Goldhaber; E M Olmstead; R S Paffenbarger; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Referral rate and outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation after cardiac catheterization in a large Canadian city.

Authors:  Colleen M Norris; Louise A Jensen; P Diane Galbraith; Michelle M Graham; William D Daub; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.081

3.  Cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention of coronary heart disease: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity), in collaboration with the American association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Arthur S Leon; Barry A Franklin; Fernando Costa; Gary J Balady; Kathy A Berra; Kerry J Stewart; Paul D Thompson; Mark A Williams; Michael S Lauer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Determinants of referral to cardiac rehabilitation programs in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review.

Authors:  Olga Cortés; Heather M Arthur
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  Cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Combined experience of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  N B Oldridge; G H Guyatt; M E Fischer; A A Rimm
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-08-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Attenuated progression of coronary artery disease after 6 years of multifactorial risk intervention: role of physical exercise.

Authors:  J Niebauer; R Hambrecht; T Velich; K Hauer; C Marburger; B Kälberer; C Weiss; E von Hodenberg; G Schlierf; G Schuler; R Zimmermann; W Kübler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-10-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Getting the most out of cardiac rehabilitation: a review of referral and adherence predictors.

Authors:  L Jackson; J Leclerc; Y Erskine; W Linden
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Predicting cardiac rehabilitation enrollment: the role of automatic physician referral.

Authors:  Kelly M Smith; Karen Harkness; Heather M Arthur
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2006-02

Review 9.  Optimal timing of phase II rehabilitation after cardiac surgery. The cardiologist's view.

Authors:  P Dubach; J Myers; D Wagner
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Effects of intensive multiple risk factor reduction on coronary atherosclerosis and clinical cardiac events in men and women with coronary artery disease. The Stanford Coronary Risk Intervention Project (SCRIP).

Authors:  W L Haskell; E L Alderman; J M Fair; D J Maron; S F Mackey; H R Superko; P T Williams; I M Johnstone; M A Champagne; R M Krauss
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  19 in total

1.  Access to cardiac rehabilitation among South-Asian patients by referral method: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Keerat Grewal; Yvonne W Leung; Parissa Safai; Donna E Stewart; Sonia Anand; Milan Gupta; Cynthia Parsons; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Rehabil Nurs       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.625

2.  Treating the right patient at the right time: Access to echocardiography in Canada.

Authors:  B Munt; B J O'Neill; C Koilpillai; K Gin; J Jue; G Honos
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  Effects of cardiac rehabilitation referral strategies on referral and enrollment rates.

Authors:  Shannon Gravely-Witte; Yvonne W Leung; Rajiv Nariani; Hala Tamim; Paul Oh; Victoria M Chan; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Examining the effect of a patient navigation intervention on outpatient cardiac rehabilitation awareness and enrollment.

Authors:  Lisa Benz Scott; Shannon Gravely; Thomas R Sexton; Sabrina Brzostek; David L Brown
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.081

5.  Ambulatory surveillance of patients referred for cardiac rehabilitation following cardiac hospitalization: a feasibility study.

Authors:  David A Alter; Juda Habot; Sherry L Grace; Terry Fair; David Kiernan; Wendy Clark; David Fell
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 5.223

6.  Telerehabilitation for patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Michel Tousignant; Warner Mbuila Mampuya
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2015-02

7.  Predicting Long-Term Mortality, Morbidity, and Survival Outcomes Following a Cardiac Event: A Cardiac Rehabilitation Study.

Authors:  Helen L Graham; Andrew Lac; Haeok Lee; Melissa J Benton
Journal:  Rehabil Process Outcome       Date:  2019-02-17

8.  A commentary on access to cardiovascular services: nursing roles and initiatives.

Authors:  Cathy Eastwood; Janine Doucet; Estrelita Estrella-Holder; June MacDonald; Natalie Nichols; Heather Sherrard; Marcie Smigorowsky; Gillian Yates; Kirsten Woodend
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  The Canadian Heart Health Strategy and Action Plan: Cardiac rehabilitation as an exemplar of chronic disease management.

Authors:  H M Arthur; N Suskin; M Bayley; M Fortin; J Howlett; G Heckman; R Lewanczuk
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.223

10.  Telerehabilitation with live-feed biomedical sensor signals for patients with heart failure: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michel Tousignant; Warner M Mampuya; Josiane Bissonnette; Emilie Guillemette; Fannie Lauriault; Julie Lavoie; Marie-Elisabeth St-Laurent; Catherine Pagé
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2019-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.