Literature DB >> 9345552

Cognitive subtractions may not add up: the interaction between semantic processing and response mode.

J M Jennings1, A R McIntosh, S Kapur, E Tulving, S Houle.   

Abstract

Determining the areas of brain activity associated with cognitive processing has typically relied on the use of a subtraction paradigm, which is based on the premise that the neural processes underlying behavior are additive. If the additivity assumption is valid then brain regions associated with a semantic processing task should be the same regardless of how participants make a response. To investigate this proposition, participants underwent six PET scans, in which they made semantic or letter word judgments, responding "yes" or "no" in three different modes: mouse-clicking, spoken response, or silent thought. Analyses showed an increase in regional cerebral blood flow associated with semantic processing in the left inferior frontal cortex, anterior cingulate, and right cerebellum for all three response conditions. However, there was a significant interaction: the greatest increase was observed in the mouse-click condition and the weakest change seen with silent thought. Moreover, other areas of the brain were uniquely activated for each response mode. The results indicate that different areas of the brain were recruited for semantic processing depending on how participants had to organize their responses. Implications for the additivity assumption and methods of analysis to be used in conjunction with the subtraction technique are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9345552     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  13 in total

Review 1.  Functional brain mapping of psychopathology.

Authors:  G D Honey; P C Fletcher; E T Bullmore
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Comparative electrophysiological and hemodynamic measures of neural activation during memory-retrieval.

Authors:  E Düzel; T W Picton; R Cabeza; A P Yonelinas; H Scheich; H J Heinze; E Tulving
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Baseline conditions and subtractive logic in neuroimaging.

Authors:  S D Newman; D B Twieg; P A Carpenter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  A new tablet for writing and drawing during functional MRI.

Authors:  Fred Tam; Nathan W Churchill; Stephen C Strother; Simon J Graham
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Some problems for representations of brain organization based on activation in functional imaging.

Authors:  John J Sidtis
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 6.  Experimental design and interpretation of functional neuroimaging studies of cognitive processes.

Authors:  David Caplan
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Off-line sentence processing: what is involved in answering a comprehension probe?

Authors:  Sharlene D Newman; Donghoon Lee; Kristen L Ratliff
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Neural correlates of the episodic encoding of pictures and words.

Authors:  C L Grady; A R McIntosh; M N Rajah; F I Craik
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-03-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  From Brain Maps to Cognitive Ontologies: Informatics and the Search for Mental Structure.

Authors:  Russell A Poldrack; Tal Yarkoni
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Babbling, chewing, and sucking: oromandibular coordination at 9 months.

Authors:  Roger W Steeve; Christopher A Moore; Jordan R Green; Kevin J Reilly; Jacki Ruark McMurtrey
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.