Literature DB >> 9345086

Effect of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis: a simulation study.

C T Falk1.   

Abstract

Linkage studies of complex genetic traits raise questions about the effects of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis. To further understand these problems, I have simulated and analyzed family data for a complex genetic disease in which disease phenotype is determined by two unlinked disease loci. Two models were studied, a two-locus threshold model and a two-locus heterogeneity model. Information was generated for a marker locus linked to one of the disease-defining loci. Random-mating and assortative-mating samples were generated. Linkage analysis was then carried out by use of standard methods, under the assumptions of a single-locus disease trait and a random-mating population. Results were compared with those from analysis of a single-locus homogeneous trait in samples with the same levels of assortative mating as those considered for the two-locus traits. The results show that (1) introduction of assortative mating does not, in itself, markedly affect the estimate of the recombination fraction; (2) the power of the analysis, reflected in the LOD scores, is somewhat lower with assortative rather than random mating. Loss of power is greater with increasing levels of assortative mating; and (3) for a heterogeneous genetic disease, regardless of mating type, heterogeneity analysis permits more accurate estimate of the recombination fraction but may be of limited use in distinguishing which families belong to each homogeneous subset. These simulations also confirmed earlier observations that linkage to a disease "locus" can be detected even if the disease is incorrectly defined as a single-locus (homogeneous) trait, although the estimated recombination fraction will be significantly greater than the true recombination fraction between the linked disease-defining locus and the marker locus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9345086      PMCID: PMC1716020          DOI: 10.1086/301591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Genet        ISSN: 0002-9297            Impact factor:   11.025


  20 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of the linkage relationship between chromosome 11p loci and the gene for bipolar affective disorder in the Old Order Amish.

Authors:  J R Kelsoe; E I Ginns; J A Egeland; D S Gerhard; A M Goldstein; S J Bale; D L Pauls; R T Long; K K Kidd; G Conte
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-11-16       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Model misspecification and multipoint linkage analysis.

Authors:  N Risch; L Giuffra
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 0.444

3.  Linkage analysis of two-locus diseases under single-locus and two-locus analysis models.

Authors:  V Vieland; D A Greenberg; S E Hodge; J Ott
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1992

4.  Linkage analysis under "random" and "genetic" reduced penetrance.

Authors:  D A Greenberg; S E Hodge
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  The affected-pedigree-member method of linkage analysis.

Authors:  D E Weeks; K Lange
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Effects of misspecifying genetic parameters in lod score analysis.

Authors:  F Clerget-Darpoux; C Bonaïti-Pellié; J Hochez
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Estimation of the recombination fraction in human pedigrees: efficient computation of the likelihood for human linkage studies.

Authors:  J Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  The combined effects of positive assortative mating and selection.

Authors:  C T Falk
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1971-08       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 9.  Bipolar affective disorders linked to DNA markers on chromosome 11.

Authors:  J A Egeland; D S Gerhard; D L Pauls; J N Sussex; K K Kidd; C R Allen; A M Hostetter; D E Housman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Feb 26-Mar 4       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 10.  Assortative mating for psychiatric disorders and psychological traits.

Authors:  K R Merikangas
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1982-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Ordered-subset analysis (OSA) for family-based association mapping of complex traits.

Authors:  Ren-Hua Chung; Silke Schmidt; Eden R Martin; Elizabeth R Hauser
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  Reduction of sample heterogeneity through use of population substructure: an example from a population of African American families with sarcoidosis.

Authors:  Cheryl L Thompson; Benjamin A Rybicki; Michael C Iannuzzi; Robert C Elston; Sudha K Iyengar; Courtney Gray-McGuire
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  TDT-HET: a new transmission disequilibrium test that incorporates locus heterogeneity into the analysis of family-based association data.

Authors:  Douglas Londono; Steven Buyske; Stephen J Finch; Swarkar Sharma; Carol A Wise; Derek Gordon
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.169

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.