Literature DB >> 2786485

Linkage analysis under "random" and "genetic" reduced penetrance.

D A Greenberg1, S E Hodge.   

Abstract

We examined whether the results of linkage analysis are affected by the reasons for so-called "reduced penetrance". We simulated linkage data with random reduced penetrance and contrasted that with data that were simulated under inheritance controlled by two loci interacting epistatically. For the two-locus disease models, one of those loci was linked to the marker. All data, irrespective of how the data were simulated, were analyzed under the assumption of a single-locus genetic model with random reduced penetrance. We found that there appears to be little bias in the results of linkage analysis whether the "reduced penetrance" was caused by random (usually interpreted as environmental) factors or by strictly genetic factors. We also illustrate that when the trait or disease is influenced by more than one locus, the inheritance of the trait at the linked locus is the important consideration, not the inheritance of the trait per se.

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2786485     DOI: 10.1002/gepi.1370060145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  23 in total

1.  Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases.

Authors:  P C Abreu; D A Greenberg; S E Hodge
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Replication of linkage studies of complex traits: an examination of variation in location estimates.

Authors:  S B Roberts; C J MacLean; M C Neale; L J Eaves; K S Kendler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Power comparison of parametric and nonparametric linkage tests in small pedigrees.

Authors:  P C Sham; M W Lin; J H Zhao; D Curtis
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-04-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Parametric and nonparametric multipoint linkage analysis with imprinting and two-locus-trait models: application to mite sensitization.

Authors:  K Strauch; R Fimmers; T Kurz; K A Deichmann; T F Wienker; M P Baur
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-05-04       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  A recessive gene for primary vesicoureteral reflux maps to chromosome 12p11-q13.

Authors:  Patricia L Weng; Simone Sanna-Cherchi; Terry Hensle; Ellen Shapiro; Alan Werzberger; Gianluca Caridi; Claudia Izzi; Anita Konka; Adam C Reese; Rong Cheng; Samuel Werzberger; Richard N Schlussel; Robert D Burk; Joseph H Lee; Roberto Ravazzolo; Francesco Scolari; Gian Marco Ghiggeri; Kenneth Glassberg; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 6.  Current perspectives on the genetics of unipolar depression.

Authors:  S O Moldin; T Reich; J P Rice
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.805

7.  Identification of novel susceptibility loci for Guam neurodegenerative disease: challenges of genome scans in genetic isolates.

Authors:  Weiva Sieh; Yoonha Choi; Nicola H Chapman; Ulla-Katrina Craig; Ellen J Steinbart; Joseph H Rothstein; Kiyomitsu Oyanagi; Ralph M Garruto; Thomas D Bird; Douglas R Galasko; Gerard D Schellenberg; Ellen M Wijsman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Affecteds-only linkage methods are not a panacea.

Authors:  D A Greenberg; S E Hodge; V J Vieland; M A Spence
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Further evidence for the increased power of LOD scores compared with nonparametric methods.

Authors:  M Durner; V J Vieland; D A Greenberg
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Effect of genetic heterogeneity and assortative mating on linkage analysis: a simulation study.

Authors:  C T Falk
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.