Literature DB >> 9344424

Learned controls of ingestive behaviour.

A Sclafani1.   

Abstract

During the 25 year history of the Columbia Appetitive Seminar there have been many notable developments in ingestive behavior research. One area of rapid progress concerns learned controls of feeding behavior. During the 1960's and 1970's most research related to food learning focused on conditioned flavor aversions. While it was assumed that animals also learned to prefer foods based on their positive nutritive consequences, there were few experimental demonstrations of this effect. Examples often cited involved animals learning to prefer a flavor associated with recovery from illness or a vitamin deficiency. There were isolated reports in the 1960's of nutrient infusions increasing flavor preference and acceptance, but it wasn't until the 1970's that nutrient-based learning was firmly established, and not until the 1980's and 1990's investigated in detail. This brief review highlights some of the major findings of nutrient-based learning. Other important aspects of food learning (social, cultural, ecological, environmental) are not discussed here. Copyright 1997 Academic Press Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9344424     DOI: 10.1006/appe.1997.0120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  27 in total

1.  Dietary learning: both consistency and congruency matter.

Authors:  Paul A M Smeets
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Signaling through the ghrelin receptor modulates hippocampal function and meal anticipation in mice.

Authors:  Jon F Davis; Derrick L Choi; Deborah J Clegg; Stephen C Benoit
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-10-29

Review 3.  Behavioral controls of food intake.

Authors:  Stephen C Benoit; Andrea L Tracy
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 4.  An application of Pavlovian principles to the problems of obesity and cognitive decline.

Authors:  T L Davidson; C H Sample; S E Swithers
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2013-07-22       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Conditioned preference for sweet stimuli in OLETF rat: effects of food deprivation.

Authors:  Bart C De Jonghe; Andras Hajnal; Mihai Covasa
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 6.  Relationships between human thirst, hunger, drinking, and feeding.

Authors:  Fiona McKiernan; Jenny A Houchins; Richard D Mattes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-04-13

Review 7.  Physiological mechanisms by which non-nutritive sweeteners may impact body weight and metabolism.

Authors:  Mary V Burke; Dana M Small
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2015-06-03

8.  Not so Sweet Revenge: Unanticipated Consequences of High-Intensity Sweeteners.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2015-03-12

9.  Associative mechanisms underlying the function of satiety cues in the control of energy intake and appetitive behavior.

Authors:  Sabrina Jones; Camille H Sample; Sara L Hargrave; Terry L Davidson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-03-17

Review 10.  The control of food intake: behavioral versus molecular perspectives.

Authors:  Stephen C Woods
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 27.287

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.