Literature DB >> 9342958

The dimensionality of the flanker compatibility effect: a psychophysiological analysis.

L R Fournier1, M K Scheffers, M G Coles, A Adamson, E V Abad.   

Abstract

The psychophysiological approach was used to evaluate the effects of feature similarity and "intrinsic response mapping" on the flanker compatibility effect. Symbol (e.g., < > < and </<) and letter arrays (e.g., HCH and SCS) were used. Results showed that delays in stimulus evaluation and both peripheral and central response competition contributed to the compatibility effect, with the contribution of these processes depending on feature similarity and the intrinsic response mapping of the stimuli. For letter stimuli, the difference in the size of the compatibility effect for similar and dissimilar arrays could be accounted for in terms of stimulus evaluation. For symbol arrays, differences in size of the compatibility effect could be accounted for by response competition. Thus, symbol and letter arrays do not appear to be processed differently; what is different is the degree to which stimulus and response-related processes are affected by incompatibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9342958     DOI: 10.1007/bf00419762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  15 in total

1.  Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow.

Authors:  H G Smid; G Mulder; L J Mulder
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1990-08

Review 2.  Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition.

Authors:  M G Coles
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Pre- and poststimulus activation of response channels: a psychophysiological analysis.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E J Sirevaag; C W Eriksen; E Donchin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Event-related brain potentials and error-related processing: an analysis of incorrect responses to go and no-go stimuli.

Authors:  M K Scheffers; M G Coles; P Bernstein; W J Gehring; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.016

6.  A psychophysiological analysis of response-channel activation and outcome states in Eriksen's noise-compatibility task.

Authors:  F Rösler; T Finger
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1993

7.  Optimal digital filters for long-latency components of the event-related brain potential.

Authors:  L A Farwell; J M Martinerie; T R Bashore; P E Rapp; P H Goddard
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Selective attentional delays and attentional capture among simultaneous visual onset elements.

Authors:  L R Fournier
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

9.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact.

Authors:  G Gratton; M G Coles; E Donchin
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-04

10.  Where did you go wrong? Errors, partial errors, and the nature of human information processing.

Authors:  M G Coles; M K Scheffers; L Fournier
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1995-11
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Tracking continuities in the flanker task: From continuous flow to movement trajectories.

Authors:  Christopher D Erb; Katie A Smith; Jeff Moher
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Two processing stages of the SNARC effect.

Authors:  Weizhi Nan; Lizhu Yan; Guochun Yang; Xun Liu; Shimin Fu
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-04-13

3.  Conflict in object affordance revealed by grip force.

Authors:  Jennifer McBride; Petroc Sumner; Masud Husain
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 2.143

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.