Literature DB >> 33847782

Two processing stages of the SNARC effect.

Weizhi Nan1, Lizhu Yan1, Guochun Yang2,3, Xun Liu4,5, Shimin Fu6.   

Abstract

The spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect showed that small/large numbers represented in the left/right space facilitated left/right responses, respectively. However, the processing stage (semantic representation or response selection) of the SNARC effect is still controversial. To investigate this issue, we adopted a modified magnitude comparison task in which the effects of SNARC, Stroop (semantic-representation stage), and Simon (response-selection stage) could be simultaneously induced. The processing stages of the SNARC effect were investigated by examining the interactions among these effects. According to the additive factor logic, if two effects are interactive, then they occur in the same stage; if two effects are additive, then they occur in different stages. Across two experiments, the SNARC effect interacted with the Stroop effect and with the Simon effect. These results suggested that the SNARC effect occurred in both the semantic-representation and response-selection stages and provided insight into that the SNARC effect might have two originating sources.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33847782     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01506-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  37 in total

1.  Oculomotor bias induced by number perception.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Nele Warlop; Robin L Hill; Wim Fias
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2004

2.  A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect.

Authors:  Ulrich Ansorge; Peter Wiihr
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Psychophysiological evidence that the SNARC effect has its functional locus in a response selection stage.

Authors:  Inge Martine Keus; Kathleen Marie Jenks; Wolf Schwarz
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-23

4.  Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain.

Authors:  Tobias Egner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Digits affect actions: the SNARC effect and response selection.

Authors:  Marwan Daar; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.027

6.  Neural correlates of stimulus and response interference in a 2-1 mapping stroop task.

Authors:  Antao Chen; Kira Bailey; Brandy N Tiernan; Robert West
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  The dimensionality of the flanker compatibility effect: a psychophysiological analysis.

Authors:  L R Fournier; M K Scheffers; M G Coles; A Adamson; E V Abad
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1997

8.  Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task.

Authors:  H S Hock; H Egeth
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-02

9.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.

Authors:  R De Jong; C C Liang; E Lauber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Number-space interactions in the human parietal cortex: Enlightening the SNARC effect with functional near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Simone Cutini; Fabio Scarpa; Pietro Scatturin; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Marco Zorzi
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Impact of Coding Levels of Magnitude and of Spatial-Direction on the Spatial-Numerical Association of Response Codes Effect of Negative Numbers.

Authors:  Xiaojin Zeng; Jian Zhang; Longnong Dai; Yun Pan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.