BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We compared the reproducibility of B-mode ultrasonographic measurements of intima-media thickness (IMT) in various segments of the right carotid artery and examined whether measurement error was associated with IMT or cardiovascular risk factor levels. METHODS: In 1994/1995 a total of 6676 participants in the Tromsø Study underwent ultrasound examination of common carotid artery IMT. Reproducibility of measurements was assessed by inviting 111 participants to a second ultrasound scan within 3 weeks of the first scan. On each occasion the subjects were examined by three sonographers. RESULTS: The mean between-observer absolute differences in IMT in the far wall of the bifurcation and the near and far walls of the common carotid-artery were 0.15, 0.10, and 0.08 mm, respectively. The corresponding within-observer differences were 0.15, 0.10, and 0.06 mm, respectively. Approximately 70% to 80% of total measurement variability was due to differences among sonographers; the rest was attributable to within-reader variability. Measurement error increased significantly with increasing IMT: the increase was more than twofold over the range of measurements. Cardiovascular risk factor levels were not associated with measurement variability when we controlled for IMT. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that B-mode ultrasound provides reproducible estimates of the IMT in both the near and far walls of the carotid artery. Although measurement error is generally small, it increases proportionally with the level of IMT.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We compared the reproducibility of B-mode ultrasonographic measurements of intima-media thickness (IMT) in various segments of the right carotid artery and examined whether measurement error was associated with IMT or cardiovascular risk factor levels. METHODS: In 1994/1995 a total of 6676 participants in the Tromsø Study underwent ultrasound examination of common carotid artery IMT. Reproducibility of measurements was assessed by inviting 111 participants to a second ultrasound scan within 3 weeks of the first scan. On each occasion the subjects were examined by three sonographers. RESULTS: The mean between-observer absolute differences in IMT in the far wall of the bifurcation and the near and far walls of the common carotid-artery were 0.15, 0.10, and 0.08 mm, respectively. The corresponding within-observer differences were 0.15, 0.10, and 0.06 mm, respectively. Approximately 70% to 80% of total measurement variability was due to differences among sonographers; the rest was attributable to within-reader variability. Measurement error increased significantly with increasing IMT: the increase was more than twofold over the range of measurements. Cardiovascular risk factor levels were not associated with measurement variability when we controlled for IMT. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that B-mode ultrasound provides reproducible estimates of the IMT in both the near and far walls of the carotid artery. Although measurement error is generally small, it increases proportionally with the level of IMT.
Authors: Mushabbar A Syed; John N Oshinski; Charles Kitchen; Arshad Ali; Richard J Charnigo; Arshed A Quyyumi Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-05-21 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: A Dahl; R Omdal; K Waterloo; O Joakimsen; E A Jacobsen; W Koldingsnes; S I Mellgren Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2006-02-24 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Cara Lea Smith; Matthew Seigerman; Srinath Adusumalli; Jay Giri; Paul N Fiorilli; Daniel M Kolansky; Taisei Kobayashi Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2021-03-08 Impact factor: 2.931
Authors: J R Larsen; M Brekke; L Bergengen; L Sandvik; H Arnesen; K F Hanssen; K Dahl-Jorgensen Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2005-03-10 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Samir N Patel; Venkataraman Rajaram; Sanjay Pandya; Benjamin M Fiedler; Charlotte J Bai; Rachel Neems; Matt Feinstein; Marshall Goldin; Steven B Feinstein Journal: Curr Atheroscler Rep Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 5.113