| Literature DB >> 19606242 |
Ivan Benaduce Casella1, Fabio José Bonafé Sotelo, Yumiko Yamazaki, Calógero Presti, Alecxander Vassoler, Henry Augusto Hoffmann Melo.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare common carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) between the two major Brazilian ethnic groups (those of African descent and those of European descent) among individuals with one or more risk factors for atherosclerotic disease.Entities:
Keywords: Atherosclerosis; Carotid; Ethnic groups; Intima-media thickness; Ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19606242 PMCID: PMC2710439 DOI: 10.1590/S1807-59322009000700009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) ISSN: 1807-5932 Impact factor: 2.365
Clinical and demographic characteristics stratified by ethnic group
| All study participants | Euro-descendants | Afro-descendants | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (n=206) | n=121(58.7%) | n=85(41.3%) | ||
| Age (years, mean±SD) | 60.8±12.9 | 61.5±12.7 | 59.7±13.1 | .32 |
| N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | ||
| Age > 59 years | 109 (52.9) | 68 (56.2) | 41(48.2) | .31 |
| Male sex | 106 (51.5) | 66 (54.5) | 40(47.1) | .35 |
| Arterial Hypertension | 172 (83.5) | 101 (83.5) | 71(83.5) | .99 |
| Diabetes Mellitus | 49 (23.8) | 29 (24.0) | 20(23.5) | .99 |
| Smoking | 72 (34.9) | 46 (38.0) | 25(30.1) | .32 |
| Stroke | 129 (62.6) | 76 (62.8) | 53(62.4) | .99 |
| TIA | 11 (5.3) | 6 (5.0) | 5(5.9) | .99 |
| Stroke / TIA | 139 (67.5) | 81 (66.9) | 58(68.2) | .96 |
| >50% ICA stenosis or occlusion | 32 (15.6) | 25 (20.7) | 7(8.2) | .02 |
Three cases of bilateral disease
Comparison of left and right common carotid artery intima-media thickness
| Mean IMT (mm)
| p | Maximum IMT (mm)
| p | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left CCA | Right CCA | Left CCA | Right CCA | |||
| Patients with normal IMT | 7.28±1.17 | 7.38±1.15 | 0.524 | 8.09±1.38 | 8.26±1.32 | 0.415 |
| Patients with increased IMT | 14.4±5.9 | 13.0±4.6 | 0.004 | 16.49±6.74 | 14.89±5.53 | 0.004 |
| All patients | 12.54±6.0 | 11.51±4.7 | 0.005 | 14.28±6.9 | 13.14±5.6 | 0.007 |
CCA: common carotid artery; IMT: intima-media thickness
Figure 1Correlation between increasing age and mean bilateral carotid wall intima-media thickness.
Risk factors associated with increased IMT*
| Mean IMT (mean±SD) | p | Maximum IMT (mean±SD) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 12.46±4.72 | .02 | 16.29±7.5 | .01 |
| Female | 11.01±4.19 | 13.83±6.52 | |||
| Age > 59 years | > 59 yr | 13.25±4.29 | <.001 | 16.9±6.83 | <.001 |
| Up to 59 yr | 10.10±4.24 | 13.04±6.98 | |||
| Systemic hypertension | Yes | 12.30±4.53 | <.001 | 15.88±7.2 | <.001 |
| No | 09.14±3.47 | 11.15±4.8 | |||
| Diabetes | Yes | 11.50±3.88 | .61 | 14.57±6.2 | .53 |
| No | 11.88±4.72 | 15.29±7.4 | |||
| Smoking | Yes | 12.85±5.08 | .088 | 16.19±7.5 | .12 |
| No | 11.35±4.17 | 14.57±6.9 | |||
| Stroke | Yes | 11.80±4.66 | .88 | 15.19±7.5 | .80 |
| No | 11.71±4.33 | 14.94±6.5 | |||
| TIA | Yes | 11.27±3.18 | .70 | 13.18±4.0 | .36 |
| No | 11.79±4.59 | 15.21±7.2 | |||
| Stroke or TIA | Yes | 11.77±4.56 | .98 | 15.06±7.3 | .92 |
| No | 11.760±4.47 | 15.16±6.8 | |||
| ICA stenosis | > 50% | 13.35±6.31 | .06 | 14.94±6.9 | .049 |
| < 50% | 11.63±5.17 | 12.82±6.0 |
Univariate analysis results
TIA, transient ischemic attack; ICA, internal carotid artery.
N=407
Comparison of mean and maximum values of intima-media thickness (IMT) between Caucasians and Afro-descendants*
| N | All patients | Caucasians | Afro-descendants | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IMT up to 1.0 mm | 61 | Mean CIMT | 7.56±1.0 | 7.7±0.9 | 7.3±1.2 | .20 |
| Maximum CIMT | 8.69±1.0 | 8.8±1.0 | 8.4±1.0 | .20 | ||
| IMT >1.0 mm | 145 | Mean CIMT | 13.6±4.1 | 13.7±4.2 | 13.5±4.2 | .79 |
| Maximum CIMT | 17.7±6.8 | 17.8±6.7 | 17.6±7.1 | .85 | ||
| No neurologic events | 67 | Mean CIMT | 11.7±4.4 | 11.9±4.3 | 11.4±4.7 | .64 |
| Maximum CIMT | 15.1±6.8 | 15.3±6.6 | 14.9±7.1 | .84 | ||
| Stroke and/or TIA | 139 | Mean CIMT | 11.8±4.5 | 11.9±4.5 | 11.7±4.5 | .90 |
| Maximum CIMT | 15.0±7.3 | 15.1±7.2 | 14.9±7.4 | .89 | ||
| Carotid stenosis < 50% | 173 | Mean CIMT | 11.5±4.4 | 11.5±4.4 | 11.4±4.5 | .88 |
| Maximum CIMT | 14.7±6.9 | 14.7±6.8 | 14.6±7.0 | .94 | ||
| Carotid stenosis > 50% | 32 | Mean CIMT | 13.0±4.6 | 13.0±4.4 | 12.8±5.5 | .94 |
| Maximum CIMT | 17.0±8.1 | 16.8±7.7 | 17.7±10.3 | .81 | ||
| All patients | 206 | Mean CIMT | 11.8±4.51 | 11.9±4.4 | 11.7±4.5 | .21 |
| Maximum CIMT | 15.1±7.14 | 15.1±7.0 | 14.9±7.3 | .23 |
Analysis was performed using Student’s t-test
Transient ischemic attack
Risk factors associated with an IMT greater than 1.0mm*
| Variable | 95% Hazard Ratio Confidence Limits | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Increasing Age | 1.115 | 1.075–1.158 | .000 |
| Systemic hypertension | 2.690 | 1.043–6.935 | .041 |
| Male sex | 2.160 | 1.021–4.570 | .044 |
Results are from multivariate analysis.