Literature DB >> 9337587

Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance.

J Dunlosky1, L T Connor.   

Abstract

How aging affects the utilization of monitoring in the allocation of study time was investigated by having adults learn paired associates during multiple study-test trials. During each trial, a subject paced the presentation of individual items and later judged the likelihood of recalling each item on the upcoming test; after all items had been studied and judged, recall occurred. For both age groups in Study 1, (1) people's judgments were highly accurate at predicting recall and (2) intraindividual correlations between judgments (or recall) on one trial, and study times on the next trial were negative, which suggests that subjects utilized monitoring to allocate study time. However, the magnitude of these correlations was less for older than for younger adults. Study 2 revealed that these differences were not due to age differences in forgetting. Results from both studies suggest that older adults do not utilize on-line monitoring to allocate study to the same degree as younger adults do, and that these differences in allocation contribute to age deficits in recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9337587     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

Review 1.  Psychological compensation: a theoretical framework.

Authors:  L Bäckman; R A Dixon
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Age differences in verbal learning.

Authors:  S J KORCHIN; H BASOWITZ
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1957-01

3.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

4.  Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy.

Authors:  L T Connor; J Dunlosky; C Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-03

5.  Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation?

Authors:  G Mazzoni; C Cornoldi; G Marchitelli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-03

6.  Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.

Authors:  R J Shaw; F I Craik
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-06

7.  Memory processes and aging: a defect of automatic rather than controlled processes?

Authors:  J Delbecq-Derouesné; M F Beauvois
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl       Date:  1989

8.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.

Authors:  A Paivio; J C Yuille; S A Madigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-01

9.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect".

Authors:  T O Nelson; R J Leonesio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Aging and metamemory: the roles of relatedness and imagery.

Authors:  J C Rabinowitz; B P Ackerman; F I Craik; J L Hinchley
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1982-11
View more
  31 in total

1.  The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning.

Authors:  K W Thiede
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  Resource allocation during spoken discourse processing: effects of age and passage difficulty as revealed by self-paced listening.

Authors:  D Titone; K J Prentice; A Wingfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

3.  The effects of age on the strategic use of pitch accents in memory for discourse: a processing-resource account.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-05-30

4.  On the effectiveness of self-paced learning.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

5.  Does believing in "use it or lose it" relate to self-rated memory control, strategy use, and recall?

Authors:  Christopher Hertzog; Christy L McGuire; Michelle Horhota; Daniela Jopp
Journal:  Int J Aging Hum Dev       Date:  2010

6.  The influence of complex working memory span task administration methods on prediction of higher level cognition and metacognitive control of response times.

Authors:  David P McCabe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

7.  Age differences in rereading.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Danielle D Gagne; Daniel G Morrow; Barbara Herman DeWall
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

Review 8.  Aging and self-regulated language processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 17.737

9.  Adult age differences in the effects of goals on self-regulated sentence processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Matthew C Shake; Joseph R Miles; Soo Rim Noh
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-12

10.  Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Memory for Past Test.

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.