Literature DB >> 2319961

Do memorability ratings affect study-time allocation?

G Mazzoni1, C Cornoldi, G Marchitelli.   

Abstract

This research addresses the relation between predicting future memory performance (judgment of learning, or JOL) and subsequent self-paced study-time allocation. The results of three experiments support the main hypotheses: (1) recall increases with increasing JOL, (2) restudy increases JOL accuracy, and (3) study time is related to JOL. This last relation depends on the length of initial presentation time of the items. When the initial exposure trials were short, the most restudy time was allocated to the items judged hard to recall, but when the initial exposure times were long, the most restudy time was allocated to the uncertain items. Items studied longer were recalled equally well (Experiments 1 and 3) or to a lesser extent (Experiment 2) than items studied for a shorter time. It is hypothesized that during study time, subjects refine their JOLs for the items initially less well discriminated.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2319961     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  6 in total

1.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.

Authors:  A Paivio; J C Yuille; S A Madigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-01

2.  Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience.

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  J Educ Psychol       Date:  1965-08

3.  Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect".

Authors:  T O Nelson; R J Leonesio
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Planfulness and recognition memory.

Authors:  B Rogoff; N Newcombe; J Kagan
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  1974-12

5.  Individual and group predictions of item difficulty for free learning.

Authors:  B J Underwood
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1966-05

6.  Presentation time and free recall.

Authors:  N C Waugh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-01
  6 in total
  15 in total

1.  The importance of monitoring and self-regulation during multitrial learning.

Authors:  K W Thiede
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-12

2.  The relation of tip-of-the-tongue states and retrieval time.

Authors:  B L Schwartz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

3.  Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.

Authors:  J Dunlosky; T O Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1992-07

4.  Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process.

Authors:  Lisa K Son; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

5.  Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Memory for Past Test.

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Sources of information in metamemory: Judgments of learning and feelings of knowing.

Authors:  B L Schwartz
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-09

7.  Easy comes, easy goes? The link between learning and remembering and its exploitation in metacognition.

Authors:  Asher Koriat
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

8.  The negative cascade of incongruent generative study-test processing in memory and metacomprehension.

Authors:  Ayanna Kim Thomas; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-06

9.  Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance.

Authors:  J Dunlosky; L T Connor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

10.  Updating metacognitive control in response to expected retention intervals.

Authors:  Joshua L Fiechter; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.