Literature DB >> 2789740

Age differences in predictions and performance on a cued recall task.

R J Shaw1, F I Craik.   

Abstract

The notion that older adults fail to use optimal encoding strategies in memory tasks because of a deficit in memory monitoring was examined in a cued recall task. Participants were given different types of descriptors (initial letters, rhyme, category) for each word during encoding, and these descriptors were later given as cues at recall. Participants also predicted the likelihood of recalling each item. Age differences were found in recall performance, but there were no age differences in average predictions. However, the prediction ratings given by younger adults showed a greater difference between words recalled and words not recalled in the subsequent test than did the ratings of the older adults. Differences in recall associated with different types of processing were predicted poorly by all of the participants, but the relative recallability of specific words was well assessed by both age groups. We concluded that a memory monitoring deficit is not likely to be responsible for age differences in memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2789740     DOI: 10.1037//0882-7974.4.2.131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Aging        ISSN: 0882-7974


  12 in total

1.  How Is Knowledge Generated About Memory Encoding Strategy Effectiveness?

Authors:  Christopher Hertzog; Jodi Price; John Dunlosky
Journal:  Learn Individ Differ       Date:  2008

2.  Age differences in the allocation of study time account for age differences in memory performance.

Authors:  J Dunlosky; L T Connor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-09

Review 3.  How often are thoughts metacognitive? Findings from research on self-regulated learning, think-aloud protocols, and mind-wandering.

Authors:  Megan L Jordano; Dayna R Touron
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  What you know can hurt you: effects of age and prior knowledge on the accuracy of judgments of learning.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Toth; Karen A Daniels; Lisa A Solinger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-04-11

5.  The effect of verbal elaborations on memory in young and older adults.

Authors:  K E Cherry; D C Park; D A Frieske; R L Rowley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1993-11

6.  Metacognition of the testing effect: guiding learners to predict the benefits of retrieval.

Authors:  Jonathan G Tullis; Jason R Finley; Aaron S Benjamin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

7.  Metacognitive monitoring and dementia: how intrinsic and extrinsic cues influence judgments of learning in people with early-stage Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ayanna K Thomas; Meeyeon Lee; David A Balota
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Objective metamemory testing captures awareness of deficit in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Stephanie Cosentino; Janet Metcalfe; Brady Butterfield; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.027

9.  Aging and recollection in the accuracy of judgments of learning.

Authors:  Karen A Daniels; Jeffrey P Toth; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-06

10.  Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.

Authors:  Fergus I M Craik; Eldar Eftekhari; Malcolm A Binns
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.