Literature DB >> 9328152

Predictive value of c-erbB-2, p53, cathepsin-D and histology of the primary tumour in metastatic breast cancer.

E Niskanen1, C Blomqvist, K Franssila, P Hietanen, V M Wasenius.   

Abstract

The value of various prognostic factors in breast cancer patients has been determined in a number of studies. Few reports have been published on the dependence of treatment outcome on histological and immunohistochemical characteristics in the primary tumour in patients with metastatic disease. We studied the incidence and prognostic value of histological and molecular abnormalities in the primary tumour of patients who had developed metastatic breast cancer. Eligible patients received a fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen either once a week or once every 4 weeks. Adequate specimens for various analyses were available from 127 patients. Median follow-up time of the patients ranged from 15 to 101 months. In this study, the histological grade of the malignancy best predicted response to chemotherapy (P < 0.0005). Most of the responses were observed in patients with grade 1 tumours; in this group, time to progression was delayed. C-erb B-2 gene amplification and oncoprotein expression had no predictive value. Neither p53 nor cathepsin-D predicted treatment outcome after chemotherapy. None of the factors had an effect on overall survival. Among breast cancer patients who received anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, response to treatment correlated with histological grade. In patients with histological grade 1 breast cancer, the time to progression was longest. However, overall survival was not affected by histological grade nor the other parameters tested. In addition to histological grade, other prognostic factors that are not included in this study need to be identified to determine which patients with metastatic breast cancer would benefit from cytotoxic treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9328152      PMCID: PMC2228069          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1997.484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  42 in total

1.  Proto-oncogene abnormalities in human breast cancer: c-ERBB-2 amplification does not correlate with recurrence of disease.

Authors:  D J Zhou; H Ahuja; M J Cline
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Alterations to either c-erbB-2(neu) or c-myc proto-oncogenes in breast carcinomas correlate with poor short-term prognosis.

Authors:  J M Varley; J E Swallow; W J Brammar; J L Whittaker; R A Walker
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  p53 protein overexpression and chemosensitivity in breast cancer. Institut Gustave-Roussy Breast Cancer Group.

Authors:  M C Mathieu; S Koscielny; M L Le Bihan; M Spielmann; R Arriagada
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-05-06       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Interobserver reproducibility of histopathological features in stage II breast cancer. An ECOG study.

Authors:  K W Gilchrist; L Kalish; V E Gould; S Hirschl; J E Imbriglia; W M Levy; A S Patchefsky; D W Penner; J Pickren; J A Roth
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  P53 expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  G Cattoretti; F Rilke; S Andreola; L D'Amato; D Delia
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1988-02-15       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Histopathological systems of breast cancer classification: reproducibility and clinical significance.

Authors:  B Stenkvist; E Bengtsson; O Eriksson; T Jarkrans; B Nordin; S Westman-Naeser
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Tyrosine kinase receptor with extensive homology to EGF receptor shares chromosomal location with neu oncogene.

Authors:  L Coussens; T L Yang-Feng; Y C Liao; E Chen; A Gray; J McGrath; P H Seeburg; T A Libermann; J Schlessinger; U Francke
Journal:  Science       Date:  1985-12-06       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Cathepsin D in primary breast carcinoma: adverse prognosis is associated with expression of cathepsin D in stromal cells.

Authors:  A E O'Donoghue; D N Poller; J A Bell; M H Galea; C W Elston; R W Blamey; I O Ellis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  An immunohistochemical evaluation of c-erbB-2 expression in human breast carcinoma.

Authors:  D M Barnes; G A Lammie; R R Millis; W L Gullick; D S Allen; D G Altman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J L Hayward; P P Carbone; J C Heusen; S Kumaoka; A Segaloff; R D Rubens
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Amplification and deletion of topoisomerase IIalpha associate with ErbB-2 amplification and affect sensitivity to topoisomerase II inhibitor doxorubicin in breast cancer.

Authors:  T A Järvinen; M Tanner; V Rantanen; M Bärlund; A Borg; S Grénman; J Isola
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 2.  A Phenomic Perspective on Factors Influencing Breast Cancer Treatment: Integrating Aging and Lifestyle in Blood and Tissue Biomarker Profiling.

Authors:  Ainhoa Arana Echarri; Mark Beresford; John P Campbell; Robert H Jones; Rachel Butler; Kenneth J Gollob; Patricia C Brum; Dylan Thompson; James E Turner
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 3.  TP53 Mutations and Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Reading beyond the Headlines.

Authors:  Ashkan Shahbandi; Hoang D Nguyen; James G Jackson
Journal:  Trends Cancer       Date:  2020-02-05

4.  The role of biological markers as predictors of response to preoperative chemotherapy in large primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Veronique F Cocquyt; Vera R Schelfhout; Phillip N Blondeel; Herman T Depypere; Kristof K Daems; Rudolphe F Serreyn; Marleen M Praet; Simon J P Van Belle
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 5.  A literature review of molecular markers predictive of clinical response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ikuo Sekine; Chikako Shimizu; Kazuto Nishio; Nagahiro Saijo; Tomohide Tamura
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Microvessel density and status of p53 protein as potential prognostic factors for adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy in retrospective analysis of early breast cancer patients group.

Authors:  Beata Biesaga; Joanna Niemiec; Marek Ziobro
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.201

7.  A multivariate analysis of tumour biological factors predicting response to cytotoxic treatment in advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  J Sjöström; S Krajewski; K Franssila; E Niskanen; V M Wasenius; S Nordling; J C Reed; C Blomqvist
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  DNA topoisomerase IIalpha expression and the response toprimary chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  G MacGrogan; P Rudolph; I de Mascarel Id; L Mauriac; M Durand; A Avril; J M Dilhuydy; J Robert; S Mathoulin-Pélissier; V Picot; A Floquet; G Sierankowski; J M Coindre
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome.

Authors:  I F Faneyte; J G Schrama; J L Peterse; P L Remijnse; S Rodenhuis; M J van de Vijver
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.