Literature DB >> 14514971

The role of biological markers as predictors of response to preoperative chemotherapy in large primary breast cancer.

Veronique F Cocquyt1, Vera R Schelfhout, Phillip N Blondeel, Herman T Depypere, Kristof K Daems, Rudolphe F Serreyn, Marleen M Praet, Simon J P Van Belle.   

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate biological markers, their correlation with response and outcome, and the change in these markers under the influence of preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) in patients with a large primary breast cancer. One hundred and thirty-five women were treated with PCT, followed by locoregional therapy and adjuvant treatment. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), HER-2, p53, and cathepsin D were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) before and after PCT. The overall response (OR) was 70% and the pathologic complete response (pCR) was 13%. Forty-four percent of the patients could be offered breast-conserving surgery (BCS). At a median follow-up of 50 mo the overall survival is 82% and the disease-free survival is 70%. No local recurrence (LR) has developed following BCS. Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) was more frequently ER-negative and HER-2-positive than invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). P53-negative and ER-negative patients seemed to be more chemosensitive compared to p53-positive patients (74% vs 53%) and ER-positive patients (75% vs 65%), but this difference did not reach statistical significance. A trend toward higher complete pathologic remission rate was seen for ER-negative patients (p = 0.0609). PgR, HER-2, and cathepsin D were not related to response. The pattern of biological markers did not change with PCT, making repeated determination useless.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14514971     DOI: 10.1385/mo:20:3:221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  33 in total

Review 1.  When is a tumor marker ready for prime time? A case study of c-erbB-2 as a predictive factor in breast cancer.

Authors:  H Yamauchi; V Stearns; D F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Harvey; G M Clark; C K Osborne; D C Allred
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry for the evaluation of HER-2/neu in breast cancer.

Authors:  T W Jacobs; A M Gown; H Yaziji; M J Barnes; S J Schnitt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer Institute.

Authors:  G Bonadonna; P Valagussa; C Brambilla; L Ferrari; A Moliterni; M Terenziani; M Zambetti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Changes of biological features in breast cancer cells determined by primary chemotherapy.

Authors:  A Frassoldati; F Adami; C Banzi; M Criscuolo; L Piccinini; V Silingardi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Response to primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with tumors not expressing estrogen and progesterone receptors.

Authors:  M Colleoni; I Minchella; G Mazzarol; F Nolè; G Peruzzotti; A Rocca; G Viale; L Orlando; G Ferretti; G Curigliano; P Veronesi; M Intra; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  M N Levine; V H Bramwell; K I Pritchard; B D Norris; L E Shepherd; H Abu-Zahra; B Findlay; D Warr; D Bowman; J Myles; A Arnold; T Vandenberg; R MacKenzie; J Robert; J Ottaway; M Burnell; C K Williams; D Tu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prognostic importance of c-erbB-2 expression in breast cancer. International (Ludwig) Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  B A Gusterson; R D Gelber; A Goldhirsch; K N Price; J Säve-Söderborgh; R Anbazhagan; J Styles; C M Rudenstam; R Golouh; R Reed
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  c-erbB-2 expression and response to adjuvant therapy in women with node-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  H B Muss; A D Thor; D A Berry; T Kute; E T Liu; F Koerner; C T Cirrincione; D R Budman; W C Wood; M Barcos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-05-05       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Primary chemotherapy in breast invasive carcinoma: predictive value of the immunohistochemical detection of hormonal receptors, p53, c-erbB-2, MiB1, pS2 and GST pi.

Authors:  G MacGrogan; L Mauriac; M Durand; F Bonichon; M Trojani; I de Mascarel; J M Coindre
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic biomarkers in squamous cell carcinoma of the anus: a systematic review.

Authors:  T Lampejo; D Kavanagh; J Clark; R Goldin; M Osborn; P Ziprin; S Cleator
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Predictors of primary breast cancers responsiveness to preoperative epirubicin/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy: translation of microarray data into clinically useful predictive signatures.

Authors:  Olga Modlich; Hans-Bernd Prisack; Marc Munnes; Werner Audretsch; Hans Bojar
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2005-08-09       Impact factor: 5.531

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.