Literature DB >> 9324144

Experience with the Whipple procedure (pancreaticoduodenectomy) in a university-affiliated community hospital.

D K Chew1, F F Attiyeh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this report is to review the current standards of the Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy and show that excellent results are achievable in a low-volume, university-affiliated community hospital.
METHODS: A case series of consecutive patients operated on during the period November 1981 to June 1996 was evaluated retrospectively. Medical records were abstracted for demographic data, clinical presentation, comorbid factors, pathological diagnosis and staging, operative records, perioperative mortality, morbidity, and length of stay. Postoperative follow-up data were obtained from telephone interviews and from the primary referring physicians.
RESULTS: A total of 29 patients underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy procedure during this 15-year period. Twenty-eight patients underwent the standard Whipple resection and 1 patient underwent an extended resection owing to the extent of the disease. The average age was 64 years (range 41 to 82). Comorbid diseases were present in 59% of cases. Jaundice was the main presenting complaint (62%), loss of weight and appetite was present in 34%. The most common indication for this procedure was malignant periampullary disease (83% of cases). Of patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, 67% were stage I and 33% were stage III. The operation lasted an average of 5.5 hours (range 3.5 to 8 h). The mean operative blood loss was 1153 mL (range 250 to 4,000). The median length of stay was 11 days (range 7 to 81). There was 1 operative mortality (3%), and the overall major morbidity rate was 28%. Three patients required reoperation (10%), 2 for intraabdominal hemorrhage and 1 for delayed gastric emptying. The major morbidity was hemorrhage at the gastrojejunostomy site (14%); 2 cases were intraabdominal and 2 were intraluminal. Pancreaticojejunostomy leak occurred in 1 patient, resulting in a localized intraabdominal abscess. Delayed gastric emptying, defined as the need for nasogastric suctioning for more than 10 days postoperatively, occurred in only 1 patient. Overall, an oral diet was tolerated after a median of 6 days (range 4 to 61). Seventy-two percent of patients had no major complications at all, 17% had one major complication, and 10% had two or more major complications. Pancreatic insufficiency was the major long-term complication, developing in about 50% of patients. There were no biliary strictures. The median survival for patients with carcinoma of the pancreas was 21 months and the 5-year survival was 15%.
CONCLUSIONS: The above study demonstrates that a complicated procedure like the Whipple pancreaticoduodenectomy can be performed with excellent results in a community hospital. The most important prerequisite is that the surgeon be adequately trained in the procedure. In low-volume hospitals, the case load should be restricted to a minimal number of trained surgeons in order to concentrate the experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9324144     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00110-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  13 in total

1.  Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortality.

Authors:  A S Rosemurgy; M Bloomston; F M Serafini; B Coon; M M Murr; L C Carey
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Achieving good perioperative outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a low-volume setting: a 25-year experience.

Authors:  Aljamir D Chedid; Marcio F Chedid; Leonardo V Winkelmann; Tomaz J M Grezzana Filho; Cleber D P Kruel
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

3.  Anastomotic leakage in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Stefano Crippa; Roberto Salvia; Massimo Falconi; Giovanni Butturini; Luca Landoni; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Striving for a better operative outcome: 101 pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  A W C Kow; S P Chan; A Earnest; C Y Chan; K Lim; S Y Chong; K H Lim; C K Ho; S P Chew; K H Liau
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  Pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary pancreatic lymphoma.

Authors:  Jessica F Rose; T Jie; Philip Usera; E S Ong
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01

6.  Extended follow-up and outcomes of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for nonmalignant disease.

Authors:  Nicholas Thomas Orfanidis; David E Loren; Carmi Santos; Eugene P Kennedy; Ali A Siddiqui; Harish Lavu; Charles J Yeo; Thomas E Kowalski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  The relevance of gastrointestinal fistulae in clinical practice: a review.

Authors:  M Falconi; P Pederzoli
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Predictive factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Matthew T McMillan; Charles M Vollmer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Impact of surgical volume on nationwide hospital mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Chul-Gyu Kim; Sungho Jo; Jae Sun Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Outcomes following pancreatic resection: variability among high-volume providers.

Authors:  Taylor S Riall; William H Nealon; James S Goodwin; Courtney M Townsend; Jean L Freeman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.