Literature DB >> 19088934

Striving for a better operative outcome: 101 pancreaticoduodenectomies.

A W C Kow1, S P Chan, A Earnest, C Y Chan, K Lim, S Y Chong, K H Lim, C K Ho, S P Chew, K H Liau.   

Abstract

Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), once carried high morbidity and mortality, is now a routine operation performed for lesions arising from the pancreatico-duodenal complex. This study reviews the outcome of 101 pancreaticoduodenectomies performed after formalization of HepatoPancreatoBiliary (HPB) unit in the Department of Surgery. A prospective database comprising of patients who underwent PD was set up in 1999. Retrospective data for patients operated between 1996 and 1999 was included. One hundred and one cases accrued over 10 years from 1996 to 2006 were analysed using SPSS (Version 12.0). The mean age of our cohort of patients was 61+/-12 years with male to female ratio of 2:1. The commonest clinical presentations were obstructive jaundice (64%) and abdominal pain (47%). Majority had malignant lesions (86%) with invasive adenocarcinoma of the head of pancreas being the predominant histopathology (41%). Median operative time was 315 (180-945) minutes. Two-third of our patients had pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) while the rest had pancreaticogastrostomy (PG). There were five patients with pancreatico-enteric anastomotic leak (5%), three of whom (3%) were from PJ anastomosis. Overall, in-hospital and 30-day mortality were both 3%. The median post-operative length of stay (LOS) was 15 days. Using logistic regressions, the post-operative morbidity predicts LOS following operation (p<0.005). The strategy in improving the morbidity and mortality rates of pancreaticoduodenectomies lies in the subspecialization of surgical services with regionalization of such complex surgeries to high volume centers. The key success lies in the dedication of staffs who continues to refine the clinical care pathway and standardize management protocol.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Whipple operation; pancreaticoduodenectomy

Year:  2008        PMID: 19088934      PMCID: PMC2597329          DOI: 10.1080/13651820802247094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  57 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  John L Cameron; Taylor S Riall; JoAnn Coleman; Kenneth A Belcher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study.

Authors:  Claudio Bassi; Massimo Falconi; Enrico Molinari; Roberto Salvia; Giovanni Butturini; Nora Sartori; William Mantovani; Paolo Pederzoli
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Outcome analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy at a community hospital.

Authors:  Alan Afsari; Zhou Zhandoug; Shun Young; Lorenzo Ferguson; Sumet Silapaswan; Vijay Mittal
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Standards of pancreaticoduodenectomy in a tertiary referral centre in Hong Kong: retrospective case series.

Authors:  R T P Poon; S T Fan; K M Chu; J T C Poon; J Wong
Journal:  Hong Kong Med J       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.227

6.  Low mortality following resection for pancreatic and periampullary tumours in 1026 patients: UK survey of specialist pancreatic units. UK Pancreatic Cancer Group.

Authors:  J P Neoptolemos; R C Russell; S Bramhall; B Theis
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  Pancreaticogastrostomy: preferred reconstruction for Whipple resection.

Authors:  D M Morris; R S Ford
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.192

8.  Personal experience with the Whipple operation: outcomes and lessons learned.

Authors:  Verne L Hoshal; Mary B Benedict; Lisa R David; Jennifer Kulick
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Variation in postoperative complication rates after high-risk surgery in the United States.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Peter J Pronovost; John A Cowan; Pamela A Lipsett; James C Stanley; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.982

10.  Pancreatic anastomotic leak after pancreaticoduodenectomy: incidence, significance, and management.

Authors:  J J Cullen; M G Sarr; D M Ilstrup
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of enhanced recovery after pancreatic surgery with particular emphasis on pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Authors:  M M E Coolsen; R M van Dam; A A van der Wilt; K Slim; K Lassen; C H C Dejong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Moving towards the New International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitions in pancreaticoduodenectomy: a comparison between the old and new.

Authors:  Winson Jianhong Tan; Alfred Wei Chieh Kow; Kui Hin Liau
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  Surgery residency training programmes have greater impact on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy than hospital volume or surgeon frequency.

Authors:  Whalen Clark; Jonathan Hernandez; Bri Anne McKeon; Alyssa Kahn; Connor Morton; Paul Toomey; John Mullinax; Sharona Ross; Alexander Rosemurgy
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.647

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.