Literature DB >> 9318544

Drag reduction by wing tip slots in a gliding Harris' hawk, Parabuteo unicinctus

.   

Abstract

The anterior-most primary feathers of many birds that soar over land bend upwards and separate vertically to form slotted wing tips during flight. The slots are thought to reduce aerodynamic drag, although drag reduction has never been demonstrated in living birds. Wing theory explains how the feathers that form the tip slots can reduce induced drag by spreading vorticity horizontally along the wing and by acting as winglets, which are used on aircraft to make wings non-planar and to spread vorticity vertically. This study uses the induced drag factor to measure the induced drag of a wing relative to that of a standard planar wing with the same span, lift and speed. An induced drag factor of less than 1 indicates that the wing is non-planar. The minimum drag of a Harris' hawk gliding freely in a wind tunnel was measured before and after removing the slots by clipping the tip feathers. The unclipped hawk had 70­90 % of the drag of the clipped hawk at speeds between 7.3 and 15.0 m s-1. At a wing span of 0.8 m, the unclipped hawk had a mean induced drag factor of 0.56, compared with the value of 1.10 assumed for the clipped hawk. A Monte Carlo simulation of error propagation and a sensitivity analysis to possible errors in measured and assumed values showed that the true mean value of the induced drag factor for the unclipped hawk was unlikely to be more than 0.93. These results for a living bird support the conclusions from a previous study of a feathered tip on a model wing in a wind tunnel: the feathers that form the slotted tips reduce induced drag by acting as winglets that make the wings non-planar and spread vorticity both horizontally and vertically.

Entities:  

Year:  1995        PMID: 9318544     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.198.3.775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  How do birds' tails work? Delta-wing theory fails to predict tail shape during flight.

Authors:  Matthew R Evans; Mikael Rosén; Kirsty J Park; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The evolution of avian wing shape and previously unrecognized trends in covert feathering.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Julia A Clarke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Barb geometry of asymmetrical feathers reveals a transitional morphology in the evolution of avian flight.

Authors:  Teresa J Feo; Daniel J Field; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Power of the wingbeat: modelling the effects of flapping wings in vertebrate flight.

Authors:  M Klein Heerenbrink; L C Johansson; A Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.704

6.  Multi-cored vortices support function of slotted wing tips of birds in gliding and flapping flight.

Authors:  Marco KleinHeerenbrink; L Christoffer Johansson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Laser Fluorescence Illuminates the Soft Tissue and Life Habits of the Early Cretaceous Bird Confuciusornis.

Authors:  Amanda R Falk; Thomas G Kaye; Zhonghe Zhou; David A Burnham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Mosaic evolution in an asymmetrically feathered troodontid dinosaur with transitional features.

Authors:  Xing Xu; Philip Currie; Michael Pittman; Lida Xing; Qingjin Meng; Junchang Lü; Dongyu Hu; Congyu Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Morphological Variations of Leading-Edge Serrations in Owls (Strigiformes).

Authors:  Matthias Weger; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.