Literature DB >> 25673687

Barb geometry of asymmetrical feathers reveals a transitional morphology in the evolution of avian flight.

Teresa J Feo1, Daniel J Field2, Richard O Prum3.   

Abstract

The geometry of feather barbs (barb length and barb angle) determines feather vane asymmetry and vane rigidity, which are both critical to a feather's aerodynamic performance. Here, we describe the relationship between barb geometry and aerodynamic function across the evolutionary history of asymmetrical flight feathers, from Mesozoic taxa outside of modern avian diversity (Microraptor, Archaeopteryx, Sapeornis, Confuciusornis and the enantiornithine Eopengornis) to an extensive sample of modern birds. Contrary to previous assumptions, we find that barb angle is not related to vane-width asymmetry; instead barb angle varies with vane function, whereas barb length variation determines vane asymmetry. We demonstrate that barb geometry significantly differs among functionally distinct portions of flight feather vanes, and that cutting-edge leading vanes occupy a distinct region of morphospace characterized by small barb angles. This cutting-edge vane morphology is ubiquitous across a phylogenetically and functionally diverse sample of modern birds and Mesozoic stem birds, revealing a fundamental aerodynamic adaptation that has persisted from the Late Jurassic. However, in Mesozoic taxa stemward of Ornithurae and Enantiornithes, trailing vane barb geometry is distinctly different from that of modern birds. In both modern birds and enantiornithines, trailing vanes have larger barb angles than in comparatively stemward taxa like Archaeopteryx, which exhibit small trailing vane barb angles. This discovery reveals a previously unrecognized evolutionary transition in flight feather morphology, which has important implications for the flight capacity of early feathered theropods such as Archaeopteryx and Microraptor. Our findings suggest that the fully modern avian flight feather, and possibly a modern capacity for powered flight, evolved crownward of Confuciusornis, long after the origin of asymmetrical flight feathers, and much later than previously recognized.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Archaeopteryx; Paraves; asymmetrical flight feather; avian flight; evolutionary transition; theoretical morphospace

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25673687      PMCID: PMC4345455          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  20 in total

1.  Theory of the growth and evolution of feather shape.

Authors:  R O Prum; S Williamson
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  2001-04-15

2.  Four-winged dinosaurs from China.

Authors:  Xing Xu; Zhonghe Zhou; Xiaolin Wang; Xuewen Kuang; Fucheng Zhang; Xiangke Du
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-23       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The evolutionary origin and diversification of feathers.

Authors:  Richard O Prum; Alan H Brush
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.875

4.  Feathers of archaeopteryx: asymmetric vanes indicate aerodynamic function.

Authors:  A Feduccia; H B Tordoff
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Mosaicism, modules, and the evolution of birds: results from a Bayesian approach to the study of morphological evolution using discrete character data.

Authors:  Julia A Clarke; Kevin M Middleton
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 15.683

6.  The global diversity of birds in space and time.

Authors:  W Jetz; G H Thomas; J B Joy; K Hartmann; A O Mooers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Linking the evolution of body shape and locomotor biomechanics in bird-line archosaurs.

Authors:  Vivian Allen; Karl T Bates; Zhiheng Li; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Narrow primary feather rachises in Confuciusornis and Archaeopteryx suggest poor flight ability.

Authors:  Robert L Nudds; Gareth J Dyke
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language.

Authors:  Emmanuel Paradis; Julien Claude; Korbinian Strimmer
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Insight into the early evolution of the avian sternum from juvenile enantiornithines.

Authors:  Xiaoting Zheng; Xiaoli Wang; Jingmai O'Connor; Zhonghe Zhou
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Inspiration for wing design: how forelimb specialization enables active flight in modern vertebrates.

Authors:  Diana D Chin; Laura Y Matloff; Amanda Kay Stowers; Emily R Tucci; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Multi-cored vortices support function of slotted wing tips of birds in gliding and flapping flight.

Authors:  Marco KleinHeerenbrink; L Christoffer Johansson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Flight, symmetry and barb angle evolution in the feathers of birds and other dinosaurs.

Authors:  Xia Wang; Ho Kwan Tang; Julia A Clarke
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Sexual Dimorphism and Population Differences in Structural Properties of Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica) Wing and Tail Feathers.

Authors:  Péter L Pap; Gergely Osváth; José Miguel Aparicio; Lőrinc Bărbos; Piotr Matyjasiak; Diego Rubolini; Nicola Saino; Csongor I Vágási; Orsolya Vincze; Anders Pape Møller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mummified precocial bird wings in mid-Cretaceous Burmese amber.

Authors:  Lida Xing; Ryan C McKellar; Min Wang; Ming Bai; Jingmai K O'Connor; Michael J Benton; Jianping Zhang; Yan Wang; Kuowei Tseng; Martin G Lockley; Gang Li; Weiwei Zhang; Xing Xu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Aerobic performance in tinamous is limited by their small heart. A novel hypothesis in the evolution of avian flight.

Authors:  Jordi Altimiras; Isa Lindgren; Lina María Giraldo-Deck; Alberto Matthei; Álvaro Garitano-Zavala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Functional roles of Aves class-specific cis-regulatory elements on macroevolution of bird-specific features.

Authors:  Ryohei Seki; Cai Li; Qi Fang; Shinichi Hayashi; Shiro Egawa; Jiang Hu; Luohao Xu; Hailin Pan; Mao Kondo; Tomohiko Sato; Haruka Matsubara; Namiko Kamiyama; Keiichi Kitajima; Daisuke Saito; Yang Liu; M Thomas P Gilbert; Qi Zhou; Xing Xu; Toshihiko Shiroishi; Naoki Irie; Koji Tamura; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  The wings before the bird: an evaluation of flapping-based locomotory hypotheses in bird antecedents.

Authors:  T Alexander Dececchi; Hans C E Larsson; Michael B Habib
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Synchrotron imaging of dentition provides insights into the biology of Hesperornis and Ichthyornis, the "last" toothed birds.

Authors:  Maïtena Dumont; Paul Tafforeau; Thomas Bertin; Bhart-Anjan Bhullar; Daniel Field; Anne Schulp; Brandon Strilisky; Béatrice Thivichon-Prince; Laurent Viriot; Antoine Louchart
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Flight aerodynamics in enantiornithines: Information from a new Chinese Early Cretaceous bird.

Authors:  Di Liu; Luis M Chiappe; Francisco Serrano; Michael Habib; Yuguang Zhang; Qinjing Meng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.