Literature DB >> 9314144

Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fluoroscopy: "how far away is far enough?".

C T Mehlman1, T G DiPasquale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To correlate the amount of radiation exposure to members of the orthopaedic surgical team based on their relative positions during a simulated fluoroscopically assisted orthopaedic procedure.
DESIGN: Experimental study using commercially available fluoroscopic units and dosimetry badges designed to measure "eye" (ocular lens), "shallow" (hands/skin), and "deep" (whole-body) radiation exposure.
SETTING: Standard hospital operating room at a level one trauma center. PARTICIPANTS: Dosimetry badge clusters at specified distances from a fluoroscopic x-ray beam. Represented positions were direct beam contact, surgeon (12 in/30.5 cm), first assistant (24 in/70 cm), scrub nurse (36 in/91.4 cm), and anesthesiologist (60 in/152.4 cm). INTERVENTION: Dosimetry badges were systematically exposed by a protocol intended to maximize radiation scatter. A maximum time for continuous fluoroscope use was set at ten minutes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Radiation exposure readings from dosimetry badges processed by a commercially available dosimetry service.
RESULTS: Maximum readings are reported. Direct beam contact resulted in approximately 4000 mrem/minute (40 mSv/min) of radiation exposure. Deep exposure for the surgeon and first assistant was 20 mrem/min (0.2 mSv/min) and 6 mrem/min (0.06 mSv/min), respectively. Superficial exposure was 29 mrem/min (0.29 mSv/min) for the surgeon and 10 mrem/min (0.1 mSv/min) for the first assistant. Eye exposure was 10 mrem/min (0.1 mSv/min) for the surgeon and 6 mrem/min (0.06 mSv/min) for the first assistant. At the scrub nurse position, no deep or eye exposure was detected. One positive badge for shallow exposure was noted at the scrub nurse position, reflecting a 2 mrem/min (0.02 mSv/min) exposure rate. After ten minutes of continuous exposure, badges assigned to the anesthesiologist position never registered any positive readings.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that unprotected individuals working twenty-four inches (70 cm) or less from a fluoroscopic beam receive significant amounts of radiation, whereas those working thirty-six inches (91.4 cm) or greater from the beam receive an extremely low amount of radiation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9314144     DOI: 10.1097/00005131-199708000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0890-5339            Impact factor:   2.512


  38 in total

1.  Doctors' knowledge of exposure to ionising radiation: doctors' exposure to ionising radiation may be cause for concern.

Authors:  Eleftherios Tsiridis; Patrick J Lusty; Ali A Narvani; Eva M Tsapakis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-15

2.  Three-dimensional computer-assisted navigation for the placement of cannulated hip screws. A pilot study.

Authors:  Marcus Christian Müller; Peter Belei; Peter H Pennekamp; Koroush Kabir; Dieter C Wirtz; Christof Burger; Oliver Weber
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Radiation exposure during 3D fluoroscopy of the knee: an experimental study.

Authors:  T Tharmviboonsri; K Riansuwan; A Nitising; B Mahaisavariya
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Ionising radiation exposure to orthopaedic trainees: the effect of sub-specialty training.

Authors:  M J Oddy; C H Aldam
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  [Precision of guidewire placement--can it be improved by applying the new, isocentric aiming principle?].

Authors:  N Suhm; P Toggwiler; M Hänni; V Quarz; A Appelt
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Radiation safety for the speech-language pathologist.

Authors:  Andrea Hayes; Julie M Alspaugh; Detlef Bartelt; Molly B Campion; John Eng; Bob W Gayler; Seanne E Henkel; Bronwyn Jones; Arpana Lingaraj; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Mark Rostkowski; Christine P Smith; Judy Haynos
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgeon during periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Inger Mechlenburg; Henrik Daugaard; Kjeld Søballe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Nail over nail technique for distal locking of femoral intramedullary nails.

Authors:  Rajesh Rohilla; Roop Singh; Narender Magu; Ashish Devgun; Ramchander Siwach; Ashish Gulia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-24       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Shape memory polymers with visible and near-infrared imaging modalities: Synthesis, characterization and in vitro analysis.

Authors:  A C Weems; J E Raymond; A D Easley; M A Wierzbicki; T Gustafson; Mbb Monroe; D J Maitland
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.361

10.  Reducing intraoperative duration and ionising radiation exposure during the insertion of distal locking screws of intramedullary nails: a small-scale study comparing the current fluoroscopic method against radiation-free, electromagnetic navigation.

Authors:  Darren Grimwood; Jane Harvey-Lloyd
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.