Literature DB >> 9310984

Effect of anode-cathode configuration on paresthesia coverage in spinal cord stimulation.

J Holsheimer1, W A Wesselink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a theoretical basis for the selection of the anode-cathode configuration in spinal cord stimulation for the management pain when one percutaneous epidural electrode or two electrodes in parallel are used.
METHODS: A computer model of spinal cord stimulation at T8-T9 was used to calculate the dorsal column areas recruited in stimulation by various configurations used in clinical practice.
RESULTS: Tripolar (or bipolar) stimulation by a single electrode, symmetrically placed over the dorsal columns, recruits the largest area and will give the widest paresthesia coverage. Stimulation by two symmetrically placed electrodes connected in parallel to a single channel pulse generator may give similar results, because of their generally smaller distance from the spinal cord, but a "summation effect" does not exist. A smaller dorsal column area is activated when two offset electrodes are used. An electrode placed laterally or transverse bipolar stimulation results in unilateral, usually segmentary, paresthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: The relative positions of cathodes and anodes and their distance from the spinal cord are the major determinants of dorsal column/dorsal root activation and paresthesia distribution. The large interpatient variability of the intraspinal geometry is the main cause of differences in paresthesia coverage among patients having optimally placed electrode(s). Changes of paresthesia coverage over time are more probable when multiple electrodes are used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9310984     DOI: 10.1097/00006123-199709000-00030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  7 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation: an update.

Authors:  Steven Falowski; Amanda Celii; Ashwini Sharan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  A spectral element method with adaptive segmentation for accurately simulating extracellular electrical stimulation of neurons.

Authors:  Calvin D Eiber; Socrates Dokos; Nigel H Lovell; Gregg J Suaning
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Spinal cord stimulation programming: a crash course.

Authors:  Breanna Sheldon; Michael D Staudt; Lucian Williams; Tessa A Harland; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Reply to letter to the editor (2000;3:159-160).

Authors: 
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2001-01

Review 5.  Current and future trends in spinal cord stimulation for chronic pain.

Authors:  T R Deer
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2001-12

6.  The Evolution of Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Forward-Looking Perspectives.

Authors:  Michael A Fishman; Ajay Antony; Michael Esposito; Timothy Deer; Robert Levy
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 7.  Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Chronic Pain: Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Amber N Edinoff; Sarah Kaufman; E Saunders Alpaugh; Jesse Lawson; Tucker L Apgar; Farnad Imani; Seyed-Hossein Khademi; Elyse M Cornett; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-05-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.