Literature DB >> 9305700

Use of concurrent chemotherapy, accelerated fractionation radiation, and surgery for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

D J Adelstein1, T W Rice, M Becker, M A Larto, T J Kirby, A Koka, M Tefft, G Zuccaro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The results of a Phase II study of concurrent chemotherapy and accelerated fractionation radiation therapy followed by surgical resection for patients with both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus are presented. Pretreatment and postinduction staging were correlated with pathologic findings at surgery to assess the role of surgical resection and the predictive value of noninvasive staging techniques.
METHODS: Patients received 2 induction courses with 4-day continuous intravenous infusions of cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day) and 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2/day) beginning on Day 1 and Day 21, concurrent with a split course of accelerated fractionation radiation (1.5 grays [Gy] twice daily, to a total dose of 45 Gy). All patients were subsequently referred for surgical resection. A single, identical postoperative course of chemotherapy and 24 Gy accelerated fractionation radiation was planned for patients with residual tumor at surgery.
RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were entered on this study; 72 patients were considered eligible and evaluable. Induction toxicity included nausea (85%), increased dysphagia (90%), neutropenia (<1000/mm3) (43%), thrombocytopenia (<20,000/mm3) (10%), and reversible nephrotoxicity (8%). Sixty-seven patients (93%) underwent surgery, and 65 (90%) were found to have resectable tumors. Twelve of these patients (18%) died perioperatively, and 18 (27%) had no residual pathologic evidence of disease. Resolution of symptoms and normalization of radiographic studies, endoscopy, or esophageal ultrasound did not identify pathologic complete responders accurately. No patient completing induction therapy and surgery experienced a locoregional recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier 4-year projected recurrence free and overall survival rates were 49% and 44%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Although this regimen is feasible, there was significant preoperative toxicity and perioperative mortality. Nonetheless, the recurrence free and overall survival rates were encouraging. However, no staging tool can predict a pathologic complete response after induction therapy accurately, suggesting a continued need for surgical resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9305700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  16 in total

1.  [Regression of oesophageal carcinomas after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy: criteria of the histopathological evaluation].

Authors:  S E Baldus; S P Mönig; W Schröder; R Metzger; S Lang; T K Zirbes; J Thiele; R P Müller; H P Dienes; A H Hölscher; P M Schneider
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.011

2.  Early response evaluation and prediction in neoadjuvant-treated patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Joerg Theisen; Bernd Krause; Christian Peschel; Roland Schmid; Hans Geinitz; Helmut Friess
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-11-30

3.  Chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Geoffrey Neuner; Ashish Patel; Mohan Suntharalingam
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2009-03

Review 4.  Neoadjuvant treatment for advanced esophageal cancer: response assessment before surgery and how to predict response to chemoradiation before starting treatment.

Authors:  Elfriede Bollschweiler; Arnulf H Hölscher; Matthias Schmidt; Ute Warnecke-Eberz
Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.087

5.  Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification.

Authors:  Paul M Schneider; Stephan E Baldus; Ralf Metzger; Martin Kocher; Rudolf Bongartz; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Hartmut Schaefer; Juergen Thiele; Hans P Dienes; Rolf P Mueller; Arnulf H Hoelscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Release of band cells from the bone marrow is impaired by preoperative chemoradiation in patients with esophageal carcinoma: increased risk of postoperative pneumonia.

Authors:  Tatsushi Suwa; Yuko Kitagawa; Takahiro Sasaki; Tomoo Shatari; Masayoshi Sakuma; Masaki Kitajima
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

7.  Treatment results of preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for stage III or IV esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hideomi Yamashita; Keiichi Nakagawa; Masao Tago; Naoki Nakamura; Kenshiro Shiraishi; Ken-ichi Mafune; Michio Kaminishi; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-01

8.  Advanced techniques in neoadjuvant radiotherapy allow dose escalation without increased dose to the organs at risk : Planning study in esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  K Fakhrian; M Oechsner; S Kampfer; T Schuster; M Molls; H Geinitz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  Neoadjuvant hyperfractionated-accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: phase II study.

Authors:  Sezer Saglam; Alptekin Arifoglu; Esra Kaytan Saglam; Fatih Tunca; Oktar Asoglu; Gulgun Engin; Sumer Yamaner
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-12

10.  The relationship between pathologic nodal disease and residual tumor viability after induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving a tri-modality regimen.

Authors:  Michael J McNamara; Lisa A Rybicki; Davendra Sohal; Daniela S Allende; Gregory M M Videtic; Cristina P Rodriguez; Kevin L Stephans; Sudish C Murthy; Siva Raja; Daniel Raymond; Denise I Ives; Joanna W Bodmann; David J Adelstein
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.