Literature DB >> 27034786

The relationship between pathologic nodal disease and residual tumor viability after induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma receiving a tri-modality regimen.

Michael J McNamara1, Lisa A Rybicki1, Davendra Sohal1, Daniela S Allende1, Gregory M M Videtic1, Cristina P Rodriguez1, Kevin L Stephans1, Sudish C Murthy1, Siva Raja1, Daniel Raymond1, Denise I Ives1, Joanna W Bodmann1, David J Adelstein1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A complete pathologic response to induction chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) has been identified as a favorable prognostic factor for patients with loco-regionally advanced (LRA) adenocarcinoma (ACA) of the esophagus and gastro-esophageal junction (E/GEJ). Nodal involvement at the time of surgery has been found to be prognostically unfavorable. Less is known, however, about the prognostic import of less than complete pathologic regression and its relationship to residual nodal disease after induction chemotherapy.
METHODS: Between February 2008 and January 2012, 60 evaluable patients with ACA of the E/GEJ enrolled in a phase II trial of induction chemotherapy, surgery, and post-operative CRT. Eligibility required a clinical stage of T3-T4 or N1 or M1a (AJCC 6(th)). Induction chemotherapy with epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) d1, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) d1, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m(2)/day continuous infusion for 3 weeks, was given every 21 days for three courses and was followed by surgical resection. Adjuvant CRT consisted of 50-55 Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy/d and two courses of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d) and fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m(2)/d) over 4 days during weeks 1 and 4 of radiotherapy. Residual viability (RV) was defined as the amount of remaining tumor in relation to acellular mucin pools and scarring.
RESULTS: Of the 60 evaluable patients, 54 completed induction therapy and underwent curative intent surgery. The Kaplan-Meier projected 3-year overall survival (OS) for patients with pathologic N0 (n=20), N1 (n=12), N2 (n=13), and N3 (n=9) disease is 73%, 57%, 35%, and 0% respectively (P<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier projected 3-year OS of patients with low (0-25%, n=19), intermediate (26-75%, n=26), and high (>75%, n=9) residual tumor viability was 67%, 42%, and 17% respectively (P=0.004). On multivariable analysis (MVA), both the pN descriptor and RV were independently prognostic for OS. In patients with less nodal dissemination (N0/N1), RV was prognostic for OS [3-year OS 85% (0-25% viable) vs. 51% (>25% viable), P=0.028]. Outcomes were poor, however, for patients with advanced nodal disease (N2/N3) regardless of RV [3-year OS 20% (0-25% viable) vs. 21% (>25% viable), P=0.55].
CONCLUSIONS: RV and the pN descriptor after induction chemotherapy are independent pathologic prognostic factors for OS in patients with LRA ACA of the E/GEJ. Patients with extensive nodal disease, however, have poor outcomes irrespective of residual tumor viability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; preoperative chemotherapy; prognosis; regression

Year:  2016        PMID: 27034786      PMCID: PMC4783752          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2078-6891.2015.097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol        ISSN: 2078-6891


  29 in total

1.  Use of concurrent chemotherapy, accelerated fractionation radiation, and surgery for patients with esophageal carcinoma.

Authors:  D J Adelstein; T W Rice; M Becker; M A Larto; T J Kirby; A Koka; M Tefft; G Zuccaro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Assessment of tumor regression of esophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of 2 commonly used scoring approaches.

Authors:  Eva Karamitopoulou; Svenja Thies; Inti Zlobec; Katja Ott; Marcus Feith; Julia Slotta-Huspenina; Florian Lordick; Karen Becker; Rupert Langer
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Patterns of recurrence after surgery alone versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy and surgery in the CROSS trials.

Authors:  Vera Oppedijk; Ate van der Gaast; Jan J B van Lanschot; Pieter van Hagen; Rob van Os; Caroline M van Rij; Maurice J van der Sangen; Jannet C Beukema; Heidi Rütten; Patty H Spruit; Janny G Reinders; Dick J Richel; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Maarten C C M Hulshof
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Histomorphologic tumor regression and lymph node metastases determine prognosis following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy for esophageal cancer: implications for response classification.

Authors:  Paul M Schneider; Stephan E Baldus; Ralf Metzger; Martin Kocher; Rudolf Bongartz; Elfriede Bollschweiler; Hartmut Schaefer; Juergen Thiele; Hans P Dienes; Rolf P Mueller; Arnulf H Hoelscher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Cancer of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction: data-driven staging for the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer Cancer Staging Manuals.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Valerie W Rusch; Hemant Ishwaran; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  A comparison of multimodal therapy and surgery for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  T N Walsh; N Noonan; D Hollywood; A Kelly; N Keeling; T P Hennessy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Residual esophageal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy frequently involves the mucosa and submucosa.

Authors:  Joel Shapiro; Fiebo J W ten Kate; Pieter van Hagen; Katharina Biermann; Bas P L Wijnhoven; J Jan B van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Prognostic significance of histopathological tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Rupert Langer; Katja Ott; Marcus Feith; Florian Lordick; Jörg-Rüdiger Siewert; Karen Becker
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Induction chemoradiotherapy increases pleural and pericardial complications after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Sudish C Murthy; Maria Solovera Rozas; David J Adelstein; David P Mason; Royce Calhoun; Lisa A Rybicki; Jingyuan Feng; Eugene H Blackstone; Thomas W Rice
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 15.609

10.  Tumor stage after neoadjuvant chemotherapy determines survival after surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.

Authors:  Andrew R Davies; James A Gossage; Janine Zylstra; Fredrik Mattsson; Jesper Lagergren; Nick Maisey; Elizabeth C Smyth; David Cunningham; William H Allum; Robert C Mason
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  Heart Dose and Outcomes in Radiation Treatment for Esophageal Cancer.

Authors:  Meghan W Macomber; Stephen R Bowen; Olga Gopan; Rosanna Yeung; Smith Apisarnthanarax; Jing Zeng; Shilpen Patel
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-03-27

2.  Lower Serum Matrix Metalloproteinase‑9 in Metastatic Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Concurrent Radiotherapy Was Significant for Prognosis.

Authors:  Ziqi Ye; Hongying Zhao; Wuyuan Zhou; Tao Ye; Chong Geng; Xiaofeng Li; Lei Yuan; Mingyu Du; Heng Xu; Qiang Wang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.147

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.